Is this allowed?

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL says:

EPEL packages are usually based on their Fedora counterparts and will
never conflict with or replace packages in the base Enterprise Linux
distributions.

--
================================================== ======================
Ian Pilcher arequipeno@gmail.com
"If you're going to shift my paradigm ... at least buy me dinner first."
================================================== ======================

_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list

On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 13:21:10 -0600
Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@gmail.com> wrote:

> Is this allowed?
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL says:
>
> EPEL packages are usually based on their Fedora counterparts and
> will never conflict with or replace packages in the base Enterprise
> Linux distributions.

No. It should not do this.

There is already a bug on it... if the maintainer doesn't act soon, I
will go in and fix it.

kevin
_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list

On 02/25/2012 01:33 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> No. It should not do this.
>
> There is already a bug on it... if the maintainer doesn't act soon, I
> will go in and fix it.
>

My bad for not searching Bugzilla first. Wasn't sure if "obsoletes"
counted as a conflict for purposes of the policy.

Thanks!

--
================================================== ======================
Ian Pilcher arequipeno@gmail.com
"If you're going to shift my paradigm ... at least buy me dinner first."
================================================== ======================

_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list