On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:07, Kevin Fenzi <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:39:55 -0600
> Stephen John Smoogen <email@example.com> wrote:
>> Hi looks like we have packages which over-ride the Red Hat provided
>> ones in epel-testing:
>> libv4l * * * * *i686 * * * * *0.8.3-2.el6
>> epel-testing * * * *108 k libv4l * * * * *x86_64
>> 0.8.3-2.el6 * * * * * *epel-testing * * * *110 k
>> are both newer than the ones in RHEL-main and should not be pushed.
>> to EPEL.
> Looks like this is a subpackage of v4l-utils
> Not sure if just that subpackage needs to go, or the entire v4l-utils,
> but it does have an owner.
Ah I wonder why I got an orphan for looking for libv4l. The v4l-utils
requires libv4l so I don't think it can go into EPEL at 0.8.3 without
some sort of repackaging.
> epel-devel-list mailing list
Stephen J Smoogen.
"The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance."
Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University.
"Let us be kind, one to another, for most of us are fighting a hard
battle." -- Ian MacLaren
epel-devel-list mailing list