FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > EPEL Development

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 11-18-2010, 11:28 AM
Peter Lemenkov
 
Default Missing packages in EL-6

Hello.

Any chance to get java-1.6.0-openjdk for ppc64?

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2608034&name=root.log
....
DEBUG util.py:268: No Package Found for java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel
....

Also what's the status of fftw - is it still missing?

--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.

_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
 
Old 11-18-2010, 01:57 PM
Peter Lemenkov
 
Default Missing packages in EL-6

2010/11/18 Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@gmail.com>:
> Hello.
>
> Any chance to get java-1.6.0-openjdk for ppc64?

Surprisingly it was available earlier:

http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/erlang/R13B/04.12.el6/data/logs/ppc64/root.log

...
DEBUG util.py:256: fop noarch
0.95-4.1.el6 build 2.6 M
DEBUG util.py:256: java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel ppc64
1:1.6.0.0-1.13.b16.el6 build 6.4 M
...

Also fop was available too. It seems that java stack seriously
degraded in RHEL6 for PPC64 recently.


--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.

_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
 
Old 11-18-2010, 03:14 PM
Orion Poplawski
 
Default Missing packages in EL-6

On 11/18/2010 05:28 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:

Also what's the status of fftw - is it still missing?



Nope, it is there. I've built against it.

--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane orion@cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com

_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
 
Old 11-19-2010, 05:32 PM
Kevin Fenzi
 
Default Missing packages in EL-6

On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 17:57:43 +0300
Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@gmail.com> wrote:

> 2010/11/18 Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@gmail.com>:
> > Hello.
> >
> > Any chance to get java-1.6.0-openjdk for ppc64?
>
> Surprisingly it was available earlier:
>
> http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/erlang/R13B/04.12.el6/data/logs/ppc64/root.log
>
> ...
> DEBUG util.py:256: fop noarch
> 0.95-4.1.el6 build 2.6 M
> DEBUG util.py:256: java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel ppc64
> 1:1.6.0.0-1.13.b16.el6 build 6.4 M
> ...
>
> Also fop was available too. It seems that java stack seriously
> degraded in RHEL6 for PPC64 recently.

Yeah, sounds like they decided not to support it for ppc64. ;(

I guess ExcludeArch for now, and longer term if folks want to they
could branch those specific packages and build only for ppc64 and keep
in step with rhel updates on it.

kevin

_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
 
Old 11-19-2010, 06:46 PM
Steve Traylen
 
Default Missing packages in EL-6

On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@scrye.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 17:57:43 +0300
> Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 2010/11/18 Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@gmail.com>:
>> > Hello.
>> >
>> > Any chance to get java-1.6.0-openjdk for ppc64?
>>
>> Surprisingly it was available earlier:
>>
>> http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/erlang/R13B/04.12.el6/data/logs/ppc64/root.log
>>
>> ...
>> DEBUG util.py:256: * fop * * * * * * * * * * * * *noarch
>> 0.95-4.1.el6 * * * * * * * build * 2.6 M
>> DEBUG util.py:256: * java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel * * ppc64
>> 1:1.6.0.0-1.13.b16.el6 * * build * 6.4 M
>> ...
>>
>> Also fop was available too. It seems that java stack seriously
>> degraded in RHEL6 for PPC64 recently.
>
> Yeah, sounds like they decided not to support it for ppc64. ;(

As I can tell the dependencies in each architecture are application
led. They chose not to support eclipse on ppc64 so a wadge of java
is not present.
Steve.


> I guess ExcludeArch for now, and longer term if folks want to they
> could branch those specific packages and build only for ppc64 and keep
> in step with rhel updates on it.
>
> kevin
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> epel-devel-list mailing list
> epel-devel-list@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
>
>



--
Steve Traylen

_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 02:26 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org