So, xerces-c is apparently not in the EPEL6 ppc64 buildroot:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2607500&name=root.log

DEBUG util.py:268: No Package Found for xerces-c-devel

What to do?

--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane orion@cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com

_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list

On 11/17/2010 04:25 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:

So, xerces-c is apparently not in the EPEL6 ppc64 buildroot:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2607500&name=root.log

DEBUG util.py:268: No Package Found for xerces-c-devel

What to do?



Still the case. Anyone? This is preventing gdal, and thus GMT, grass, ....

Do we just exclude arch? Which I guess is fine by me, since I hate debugging
ppc issues.


--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane orion@cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com

_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 14:55, Orion Poplawski <orion@cora.nwra.com> wrote:
> On 11/17/2010 04:25 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>
>> So, xerces-c is apparently not in the EPEL6 ppc64 buildroot:
>>
>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2607500&name=root.log
>>
>> DEBUG util.py:268: No Package Found for xerces-c-devel
>>
>> What to do?
>>
>
> Still the case. *Anyone? *This is preventing gdal, and thus GMT, grass, ....
>
> Do we just exclude arch? *Which I guess is fine by me, since I hate
> debugging ppc issues.
>

I would say exclude arch.


--
Stephen J Smoogen.
"The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance."
Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University.
"Let us be kind, one to another, for most of us are fighting a hard
battle." -- Ian MacLaren

_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list

On Thu, 2 Dec 2010 19:14:13 -0700
Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 14:55, Orion Poplawski <orion@cora.nwra.com>
> wrote:

...snip...

> > Do we just exclude arch? *Which I guess is fine by me, since I hate
> > debugging ppc issues.
> >
>
> I would say exclude arch.

Yeah, for now I would agree.

kevin
_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list

Kevin Fenzi (kevin@scrye.com) said:
> > > Do we just exclude arch? *Which I guess is fine by me, since I hate
> > > debugging ppc issues.
> > >
> >
> > I would say exclude arch.
>
> Yeah, for now I would agree.

IMO, either a) exclude arch or b) build exclusivearch versions of dependent
packages for ppc.

Bill

_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list