FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > EPEL Development

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 10-25-2010, 06:36 PM
Mark Chappell
 
Default EPEL Meeting today: Proposed Agenda

Proposed Agenda for today: (Sorry it's so late it's been one of those days)

* Matters Arising:
* - Rubygem rack
* - Broken Deps in Stable
* Bug List
* Conflicting Packages Policy
* EPEL support cycle
* Open Floor


Anything else?


Mark

_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
 
Old 10-25-2010, 08:18 PM
Mark Chappell
 
Default EPEL Meeting today: Proposed Agenda

Minutes:

1. Roll Call (tremble, 19:33:44)
2. agenda (tremble, 19:35:09)
3. Rubygem rack (tremble, 19:36:14)
1. New version in testing, announce message sent, already has
positive karma (tremble, 19:37:16)
2. Next on stahnma's ruby hit list... rails... (tremble, 19:41:05)

4. Broken Deps in stable (tremble, 19:41:29)
1. rack fixes the last of the ruby ones in epel5 (tremble, 19:42:00)
2. need to weed out the centos/rhel artifacts still (tremble, 19:42:17)
3. General consensus that we should tidy up stable, then look
at testing. (tremble, 19:44:45)
4. ACTION: nirik will work on untagging/cleaning up deps as
possible this week. (nirik, 19:45:10)

5. Buglist (tremble, 19:46:16)
1. Currently stands at 189 (tremble, 19:46:45)
2. If anyone wants help on bugs they should feel free to post
to the epel-devel mailing list or to ask on #epel and there's a couple
of us willing to lend a hand if possible. (tremble, 19:50:52)

6. Conflicting packages policy (tremble, 19:51:38)
1. packages shouldn't conflict. If that means you have to
configure it to use one over the other, note that in a README.fedora
(tremble, 19:53:08)

7. EPEL support cycle (tremble, 19:58:05)
1. People generally agreed we wouldn't go to a hard "no new
packages" policy for EPEL-5 as sooon as RHEL-6 is available. (tremble,
20:00:55)

8. open floor (tremble, 20:02:13)
9. Open floor (EPEL-6) (tremble, 20:03:19)
1. We need to think about when we want to leave "beta" state
and start requiring updates (tremble, 20:13:45)


Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-10-25/fedora-meeting.2010-10-25-19.33.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-10-25/fedora-meeting.2010-10-25-19.33.txt
Log:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-10-25/fedora-meeting.2010-10-25-19.33.log.html

_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 01:54 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org