On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 20:40:00 +0200
> Mark Chappell <email@example.com> wrote:
>> > Oh and on my actions from the last meeting attached is the rough
>> > status (package, owner, built or unbuilt) of the EPEL packages, note
>> > I'm aware that some of these are red herrings, but the numbers
>> > aren't looking brilliant...
> How about we spam maintainers one more time and do something like:
> "We've noticed you haven't built your EPEL6 package(s) yet.
> Since we would like to see a nice thriving ecosystem of packages, we
> would like to mass orphan packages in EL6 that have not yet been built.
> Then, interested folks could pick them up and build and maintain them.
> If you intend to build, but just haven't had a chance yet, feel free to
> re-take ownership of the packages or join back as co-maintainer."
> Or is that too harsh?
> epel-devel-list mailing list
I'd be fine with it, but I am direct and harsh
epel-devel-list mailing list