On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 10:12, Jose Pedro Oliveira <jpo@di.uminho.pt> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The current Lua RPMS in EPEL5 [1] are affected by two bugs
>
> Â** Bug 495095 - pkg-config reports wrong --libs output for
> Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â*lua-devel in EPEL on 64-bit OS
> Â** Bug 499238 - liblua-5.1.so missing -lm dependency, lua.spec
> Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â*fix provided
>
> that make it unsuable. Rebuilding the Fedora lua-5.1.4-4 rpms
> for EPEL5 fixed both problems for me.
>
> Could someone please look into it?

Ugh sorry. Thanks for the info. I will bring up in meeting and hope to
fix into testing by Tuesday.


--
Stephen J Smoogen.
“The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance.�
Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University.
"We have a strategic plan. It's called doing things.""
— Herb Kelleher, founder Southwest Airlines

_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list

On 2010-09-12 18:18, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 10:12, Jose Pedro Oliveira <jpo@di.uminho.pt> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The current Lua RPMS in EPEL5 [1] are affected by two bugs
>>
>> * Bug 495095 - pkg-config reports wrong --libs output for
>> lua-devel in EPEL on 64-bit OS
>> * Bug 499238 - liblua-5.1.so missing -lm dependency, lua.spec
>> fix provided
>>
>> that make it unsuable. Rebuilding the Fedora lua-5.1.4-4 rpms
>> for EPEL5 fixed both problems for me.
>>
>> Could someone please look into it?
>
> Ugh sorry. Thanks for the info. I will bring up in meeting and hope to
> fix into testing by Tuesday.

Sorry to bring this up again. But would it possible to have
this problem solved? Or at least be mentioned in the next
EPEL meeting?

tia,
jpo
--
José Pedro Oliveira
* mailto:jpo@di.uminho.pt *

_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list

On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 21:28:48 +0100
Jose Pedro Oliveira <jpo@di.uminho.pt> wrote:

> Sorry to bring this up again. But would it possible to have
> this problem solved? Or at least be mentioned in the next
> EPEL meeting?

Sorry for the delay here... I am going to try and get it updated this
week.

Patches and karma once it's updated welcome.

kevin
_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list