Perl modules in EPEL
On 21.12.2007 16:38, Steven Pritchard wrote:
> I've been trying again recently to get as many Perl module packages
> built for EPEL as possible (so maybe we can finally have amavisd-new,
> rt3, etc. available).
Many thx for your help. Also many thx to spot, he build some new perl
packager in the past days as well!
> In case anyone else is interested, here's how
> many Perl module packages are available for various releases (counting
> source rpms, not including the perl package itself):
Some more stats from the pkgdb:
790 packages in the pkgdb starting with perl-
a few of them are in EL5, so 734 remain
Those with "# of packages >= 5"
Fedora EPEL fasname
159 13 cweyl
158 83 spot
141 131 steve
70 18 rnorwood
48 0 corsepiu
25 14 pghmcfc
23 4 ixs
18 0 alexlan
15 1 iburrell
13 13 pertusus
13 12 sindrepb
11 11 orion
10 0 hardaker
9 9 ruben
5 4 mmcgrath
5 2 wtogami
5 0 abompard
The above table is not to blame anyone. But it shows some things:
* steve, you gets bonus points for having the most perl-packages in EPEL
* pertusus gets bonus points for having all his packages in both Fedora
and EPEL
* corsepiu owns a lot of perl-packages, but doesn't participate in EPEL
(he's listed on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/ContributorStatusNo
), thus his package will only land in EPEL if someone else takes care of
them;
* abompard is also listed on ContributorStatusNo (quote: "feel free to
maintain my packages in EPEL")
* cweyl and rnorwood participate in EPEL, but own a lot of perl-*
packages which are not in EPEL.
Cu
knurd
_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
|
