|
|
12-10-2007, 10:17 PM
|
|
|
Updated Build Roots to 5.1
I've updated the build roots to 5.1 and sent a test build through it
seemed to work fine. Please keep an eye out for any issues.
-Mike
_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
|
|
12-11-2007, 02:29 PM
|
|
|
Updated Build Roots to 5.1
Mike McGrath wrote:
I've updated the build roots to 5.1 and sent a test build through it
seemed to work fine. Please keep an eye out for any issues.
I couldn't get this to work.
My package needs libvirt >= 0.2.1 which was distributed in RHEL 5.1 (but
not RHEL 5 GA which used some older version of libvirt).
I just now tried a rebuild and encountered two problems. Firstly all
the builders except the ppc builder seem to be down:
$ plague-client list_builders
Builders:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
xenbuilder1.fedora.redhat.com x86_64 amd64 ia32e noarch
i386 i486 i586 i686 athlon unavailable
xenbuilder2.fedora.redhat.com unavailable
xenbuilder3.fedora.redhat.com unavailable
hammer2.fedora.redhat.com x86_64 amd64 ia32e noarch
i386 i486 i586 i686 athlon unavailable
ppc1.fedora.redhat.com unavailable
ppc2.fedora.redhat.com ppc ppc32 noarch alive
ppc3.fedora.redhat.com ppc ppc32 noarch alive
Secondly the build (on the ppc builder) failed, indicating that libvirt
>= 0.2.1 isn't available:
http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-5-epel/37359-ocaml-libvirt-0.3.3.0-4.el5/ppc/job.log
...
Cannot find build req libvirt-devel >= 0.2.1. Exiting.
Rich.
--
Emerging Technologies, Red Hat - http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/
Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod
Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in
England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903
_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
|
|
12-11-2007, 02:35 PM
|
|
|
Updated Build Roots to 5.1
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:29:17 +0000
"Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@redhat.com> wrote:
> Secondly the build (on the ppc builder) failed, indicating that
> libvirt
> >= 0.2.1 isn't available:
>
> http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-5-epel/37359-ocaml-libvirt-0.3.3.0-4.el5/ppc/job.log
> ...
> Cannot find build req libvirt-devel >= 0.2.1. Exiting.
Was libvirt even released on PPC for RHEL5* ? I thought that was new
in Fedora land.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
|
|
12-12-2007, 12:29 PM
|
|
|
Updated Build Roots to 5.1
Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:29:17 +0000
"Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@redhat.com> wrote:
Secondly the build (on the ppc builder) failed, indicating that
libvirt
>= 0.2.1 isn't available:
http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-5-epel/37359-ocaml-libvirt-0.3.3.0-4.el5/ppc/job.log
...
Cannot find build req libvirt-devel >= 0.2.1. Exiting.
Was libvirt even released on PPC for RHEL5* ? I thought that was new
in Fedora land.
Now that the builders are fixed, I'm getting the exact same error on i386:
No Package Found for libvirt-devel >= 0.2.1
(from:
http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-5-epel/37397-ocaml-libvirt-0.3.3.0-4.el5/i386/)
Is there something I have to do to make it use the build root from 5.1?
Rich.
--
Emerging Technologies, Red Hat - http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/
Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod
Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in
England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903
_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
|
|
12-12-2007, 02:57 PM
|
|
|
Updated Build Roots to 5.1
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 12:29:56 +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:29:17 +0000
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
Secondly the build (on the ppc builder) failed, indicating that
libvirt
>= 0.2.1 isn't available:
http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-5-epel/37359-ocaml-libvirt-0.3.3.0-4.el5/ppc/job.log
...
Cannot find build req libvirt-devel >= 0.2.1. Exiting.
Was libvirt even released on PPC for RHEL5* ? I thought that was new
in Fedora land.
Now that the builders are fixed, I'm getting the exact same error on i386:
No Package Found for libvirt-devel >= 0.2.1
(from:
http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-5-epel/37397-ocaml-libvirt-0.3.3.0-4.el5/i386/)
Is there something I have to do to make it use the build root from 5.1?
To me the RHEL5 repository, which is used by the builders, does not look
up-to-date. Only the old/original libvirt-devel-0.1.8-15.el5 is in there.
You're correct, the new libvirt is indeed not in there. I had only
updated Client and Server repos. I didn't realize we were also using
the Cluster and VT repos, I'll update them now.
-Mike
_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
|
|
12-12-2007, 02:57 PM
|
|
|
Updated Build Roots to 5.1
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 12:29:56 +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:29:17 +0000
> > "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> >
> >> Secondly the build (on the ppc builder) failed, indicating that
> >> libvirt
> >> >= 0.2.1 isn't available:
> >>
> >> http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-5-epel/37359-ocaml-libvirt-0.3.3.0-4.el5/ppc/job.log
> >> ...
> >> Cannot find build req libvirt-devel >= 0.2.1. Exiting.
> >
> > Was libvirt even released on PPC for RHEL5* ? I thought that was new
> > in Fedora land.
>
> Now that the builders are fixed, I'm getting the exact same error on i386:
>
> No Package Found for libvirt-devel >= 0.2.1
> (from:
> http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-5-epel/37397-ocaml-libvirt-0.3.3.0-4.el5/i386/)
>
> Is there something I have to do to make it use the build root from 5.1?
To me the RHEL5 repository, which is used by the builders, does not look
up-to-date. Only the old/original libvirt-devel-0.1.8-15.el5 is in there.
_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
|
|
12-12-2007, 04:07 PM
|
|
|
Updated Build Roots to 5.1
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Mike McGrath wrote:
You're correct, the new libvirt is indeed not in there. I had only
updated Client and Server repos. I didn't realize we were also using
the Cluster and VT repos, I'll update them now.
This seems to be working on i386 & x86-64 now, thanks.
ppc is still missing out on libvirt for reasons unknown. There's no
problem compiling libvirt on ppc, and indeed we ship it on ppc in Fedora.
AFAIK libvirt does not ship with ppc RHEL.
-Mike
_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
|
|
12-12-2007, 04:11 PM
|
|
|
Updated Build Roots to 5.1
Mike McGrath wrote:
You're correct, the new libvirt is indeed not in there. I had only
updated Client and Server repos. I didn't realize we were also using
the Cluster and VT repos, I'll update them now.
This seems to be working on i386 & x86-64 now, thanks.
ppc is still missing out on libvirt for reasons unknown. There's no
problem compiling libvirt on ppc, and indeed we ship it on ppc in Fedora.
Rich.
--
Emerging Technologies, Red Hat - http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/
Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod
Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in
England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903
_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
|
|
12-12-2007, 04:23 PM
|
|
|
Updated Build Roots to 5.1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Mike McGrath wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> Mike McGrath wrote:
>>> You're correct, the new libvirt is indeed not in there. I had only
>>> updated Client and Server repos. I didn't realize we were also using
>>> the Cluster and VT repos, I'll update them now.
>>
>> This seems to be working on i386 & x86-64 now, thanks.
>>
>> ppc is still missing out on libvirt for reasons unknown. There's no
>> problem compiling libvirt on ppc, and indeed we ship it on ppc in Fedora.
>
> AFAIK libvirt does not ship with ppc RHEL.
...because the RHEL libvirt only supports xen and there is no ppc xen.
- --
Jarod Wilson
jwilson@redhat.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFHYAsctO+bni+75QMRAjXkAKCqyYJL6hc2FHADZx3ou7 Y3Is1AfACfTw52
LV3W76pNk4x4denCQCBytX0=
=hHDZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:01 AM.
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright ©2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org
|
