Hi,

This is the third time I have tried to get some kind of response on this.

Is there any way to stop this spam???


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Fedora Extras repoclosure <buildsys@fedoraproject.org>
Date: Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 5:17 AM
Subject: Broken dependencies in EPEL - 2008-06-29
To: chris.stone@gmail.com


Your following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies:

================================================== ====================
The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
================================================== ====================

package: php-Smarty - 2.6.19-1.el5.noarch from fedora-epel-testing-5-i386
unresolved deps:
php >= 0:5.1.6-20

_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list

On Sun June 29 2008, Christopher Stone wrote:

> This is the third time I have tried to get some kind of response on this.
>
> Is there any way to stop this spam???

There was a response in:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/2008-June/msg00164.html

You need to get your package removed by the epel signers and rebuild it once
the dependencies are there.

Regards,
Till
_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list

2008/6/29 Till Maas <opensource@till.name>:
> On Sun June 29 2008, Christopher Stone wrote:
>
>> This is the third time I have tried to get some kind of response on this.
>>
>> Is there any way to stop this spam???
>
> There was a response in:
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/2008-June/msg00164.html
>
> You need to get your package removed by the epel signers and rebuild it once
> the dependencies are there.

Ah, somehow I missed that reply. So, can we do this? Is there a
special e-mail for epel signers? When will epel5.2 be a part of the
build system? Why isnt the build system up to date?

_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list

On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 15:08 -0700, Christopher Stone wrote:
> 2008/6/29 Till Maas <opensource@till.name>:
> > On Sun June 29 2008, Christopher Stone wrote:
> >
> >> This is the third time I have tried to get some kind of response on this.
> >>
> >> Is there any way to stop this spam???
> >
> > There was a response in:
> > https://www.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/2008-June/msg00164.html
> >
> > You need to get your package removed by the epel signers and rebuild it once
> > the dependencies are there.
>
> Ah, somehow I missed that reply. So, can we do this? Is there a
> special e-mail for epel signers? When will epel5.2 be a part of the
> build system? Why isnt the build system up to date?

I believe they were originally holding out for CentOS 5.2. But it's now
out, so it's just a matter of priorities.

--
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet@gmail.com>

PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed
_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list

On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 20:10:59 -0400
ivazqueznet@gmail.com (Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams) wrote:

> On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 15:08 -0700, Christopher Stone wrote:
> > 2008/6/29 Till Maas <opensource@till.name>:
> > > On Sun June 29 2008, Christopher Stone wrote:
> > >
> > >> This is the third time I have tried to get some kind of response
> > >> on this.
> > >>
> > >> Is there any way to stop this spam???
> > >
> > > There was a response in:
> > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/2008-June/msg00164.html
> > >
> > > You need to get your package removed by the epel signers and
> > > rebuild it once the dependencies are there.
> >
> > Ah, somehow I missed that reply. So, can we do this? Is there a
> > special e-mail for epel signers? When will epel5.2 be a part of the
> > build system? Why isnt the build system up to date?
>
> I believe they were originally holding out for CentOS 5.2. But it's
> now out, so it's just a matter of priorities.

I have filed a ticket for this to happen:

https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/669

Hopefully it will be done pretty soon.

kevin
_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list