bcache performance test problem
That is pretty terrible performance. If you could try digging around a
bit with perf, blktrace, etc. that'd be much appreciated - otherwise I'll see if I can come up with some way of reproducing it as soon as I have time. I haven't done a lot of performance testing on upstream kernels, unfortunately. On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:14 PM, Qinling <mail.qinling@huawei.com> wrote: > Hi Kent, > > > > I have tested bcache on my platform, but the result is not good. I think > maybe the wrong config caused it. Would you pls help me to check the config, > or give me some advice for bcache performance testing? > > > > My SSD card is Â*a PCIe SSD card (about 120,000 IOPS), and I used 10GB. > > > > I have download the code from > git://evilpiepirate.org/~kent/linux-bcache.git. > > The commands creating bcache is below: > > make-bcache –B /dev/sdb8 > > make-bcache –C –w4k –b1M –writeback /dev/hioa5 > > > > I use FIO to test the seq./random IO performance, and the result is below: > > writeÂ*Â*Â*Â* Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*readÂ*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*randwriteÂ*Â*Â* randread > > bcacheÂ*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*10809 KB/sÂ* Â*Â*164502.5 KB/sÂ*Â*Â*Â* 2713 KB/sÂ*Â*Â* 29640 KB/s > > cache_hit_rateÂ* 80Â*Â*Â*Â* Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*79Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* Â* Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*94 > Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*92 > > > > > > And the basic test result is: > > Write Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*readÂ*Â*Â*Â*Â* Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* randwriteÂ*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*randread > > HDDÂ*Â*Â*Â*Â* 81211.6 KB/sÂ*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* 172242 KB/sÂ*Â*Â*Â* 2606 KB/sÂ*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* Â*Â*Â*Â*1855 KB/s > > SSDÂ*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* 250948.2 KB/sÂ*Â*Â*Â* 813855 KB/sÂ*Â*Â*Â* 238892.7 KB/sÂ*Â*Â*Â*Â* 657319.5 KB/s > > -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 04:50 AM. |
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.