> > This is prep work for killing bi_destructor - previously, pktcdvd had
> > its own pkt_bio_alloc which was basically duplication bio_kmalloc(),
> > necessitating its own bi_destructor implementation.
> >
> > v5: Un-reorder some functions, to make the patch easier to review
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>
> > CC: Peter Osterlund <petero2@telia.com>
>
> Apart from bio_reset() not resetting bi_end_io and bi_private, this
> looks fine to me but lack of testing makes me a bit hesitant to ack
> it.
I have just tested this v6 patchset (and it works for pktcddvd), only to
see that Kent has sent out v7 (unfortunately he hasn't CCed me on it).
v6 works nicely, bus as far as I understand it, even in v7 we are not
resetting bi_end_io and bi_private properly, right?
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
09-04-2012, 09:05 AM
Jiri Kosina
pktcdvd: Switch to bio_kmalloc()
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > This is prep work for killing bi_destructor - previously, pktcdvd had
> > its own pkt_bio_alloc which was basically duplication bio_kmalloc(),
> > necessitating its own bi_destructor implementation.
>
> How was this tested?
I have now tested it and it works properly. You can add
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
once you will be pushing the patchset through (I will be pushing
MAINTAINERS update through my tree to Jens separately).
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
09-05-2012, 07:44 PM
Kent Overstreet
pktcdvd: Switch to bio_kmalloc()
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 11:05:06AM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> > > This is prep work for killing bi_destructor - previously, pktcdvd had
> > > its own pkt_bio_alloc which was basically duplication bio_kmalloc(),
> > > necessitating its own bi_destructor implementation.
> >
> > How was this tested?
>
> I have now tested it and it works properly. You can add
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
>
> once you will be pushing the patchset through (I will be pushing
> MAINTAINERS update through my tree to Jens separately).
Thanks! I'll make sure and add you to the cc next time - I'll have
another patch or two for pktcdvd coming soon as I clean up the next
patch series.
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
09-05-2012, 08:27 PM
Kent Overstreet
pktcdvd: Switch to bio_kmalloc()
This is prep work for killing bi_destructor - previously, pktcdvd had
its own pkt_bio_alloc which was basically duplication bio_kmalloc(),
necessitating its own bi_destructor implementation.
v5: Un-reorder some functions, to make the patch easier to review
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
09-06-2012, 09:32 PM
Kent Overstreet
pktcdvd: Switch to bio_kmalloc()
This is prep work for killing bi_destructor - previously, pktcdvd had
its own pkt_bio_alloc which was basically duplication bio_kmalloc(),
necessitating its own bi_destructor implementation.
v5: Un-reorder some functions, to make the patch easier to review
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
09-06-2012, 10:34 PM
Kent Overstreet
pktcdvd: Switch to bio_kmalloc()
This is prep work for killing bi_destructor - previously, pktcdvd had
its own pkt_bio_alloc which was basically duplication bio_kmalloc(),
necessitating its own bi_destructor implementation.
v5: Un-reorder some functions, to make the patch easier to review
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
09-07-2012, 08:44 PM
Kent Overstreet
pktcdvd: Switch to bio_kmalloc()
This is prep work for killing bi_destructor - previously, pktcdvd had
its own pkt_bio_alloc which was basically duplication bio_kmalloc(),
necessitating its own bi_destructor implementation.
v5: Un-reorder some functions, to make the patch easier to review