-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I have noticed that LVM and dmraid use upper case prefixes to uuids (
LVM- and DMRAID- ) but multipath-tools uses lower case ( mpath- ).
Shouldn't they be the same?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk2KpZ8ACgkQJ4UciIs+XuJeKACgpt0xY9K3XP Urtp7shsxgucIo
os0AnAnEyu4behUF7t6+tx+f0IzXe/3J
=GO7r
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

Thu Mar 24 03:30:01 2011
Return-path: <centos-devel-bounces@centos.org>
Envelope-to: tom@linux-archive.org
Delivery-date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 02:53:27 +0200
Received: from mail.centos.org ([72.26.200.202]:42794)
by s2.java-tips.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <centos-devel-bounces@centos.org>)
id 1Q2Ynn-00037G-FS
for tom@linux-archive.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 02:53:27 +0200
Received: from mail.centos.org (voxeldev.centos.org [127.0.0.1])
by mail.centos.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34BF06F86E;
Wed, 23 Mar 2011 22:07:31 -0400 (EDT)
X-Original-To: centos-devel@centos.org
Delivered-To: centos-devel@centos.org
Received: from mail-iy0-f179.google.com (mail-iy0-f179.google.com
[209.85.210.179])
by mail.centos.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E5C467B7E
for <centos-devel@centos.org>; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 22:07:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by iym7 with SMTP id 7so9939445iym.38
for <centos-devel@centos.org>; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 19:07:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.43.47.201 with SMTP id ut9mr12176945icb.186.1300932448805;
Wed, 23 Mar 2011 19:07:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.218.136 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 19:07:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4D8A35ED.1050705@davehollis.com>
References: <4D89B9CD.8080401@gmail.com> <4D89BD1F.4070007@plnet.rs>
<4D89C16D.9070207@gmail.com>
<20110323095247.GI10277@frodo.gerdesas.com>
<4D89C4A9.1090806@gmail.com> <4D89C6C6.8090503@nobugconsulting.ro>
<4D89C951.3050001@gmx.de> <4D89CE94.3070109@nobugconsulting.ro>
<4D89CF3C.8090907@gmail.com> <20110323155315.GA26401@esri.com>
<4D8A35ED.1050705@davehollis.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 09:07:28 +0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTikjXE+ssG3j1s009hYqdt-kQ2xtUJbEPfNp6HY2@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?KOI8-R?B?9dPUyc7P1yDhzMXL08HOxNIg4czFy9PBzsTSzw==?=
=?KOI8-R?B?18ne?= <rusfearuth@gmail.com>
To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel@centos.org>
Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
X-BeenThere: centos-devel@centos.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel@centos.org>
List-Id: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel.centos.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel>,
<mailto:centos-devel-request@centos.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:centos-devel@centos.org>
List-Help: <mailto:centos-devel-request@centos.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel>,
<mailto:centos-devel-request@centos.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1956832988=="
Sender: centos-devel-bounces@centos.org
Errors-To: centos-devel-bounces@centos.org

--===============1956832988==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec52e622d7ce455049f30f08b

--bcaec52e622d7ce455049f30f08b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

SL has extra packages (it means they wasn't included into RHEL) that was
included in it.

... we have added several packages to Scientific Linux that are not found
anywhere in the upstream release, including IceWM, OpenAFS, Revisor, Live
USB Creator, YUM auto-update, external YUM repositories... (c) from
http://distrowatch.com/?newsid=06549

SL and CentOS like two people that go different ways, but have the common
base.

Kind regards,
Alexander Ustinov

--bcaec52e622d7ce455049f30f08b
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

SL has extra packages (it means they wasn't included into RHEL) that wa=
s included in it.<div><br></div><div><meta http-equiv=3D"content-type" cont=
ent=3D"text/html; charset=3Dutf-8"><span class=3D"Apple-style-span" style=
=3D"color: rgb(153, 0, 0); font-size: 15px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spaci=
ng: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px; font-family: 'Liberation=
Sans', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif, generic; ">... we have added seve=
ral packages to Scientific Linux that are not found anywhere in the upstrea=
m release, including IceWM, OpenAFS, Revisor, Live USB Creator, YUM auto-up=
date, external YUM repositories... (c) from=A0</span><a href=3D"http://dist=
rowatch.com/?newsid=3D06549">http://distrowatch.com/?newsid=3D06549</a></di=
v>
<div><br></div><div>SL and CentOS like two people that go different ways, b=
ut have the common base.</div><div><br></div><div>Kind regards,</div><div>A=
lexander Ustinov</div><meta http-equiv=3D"content-type" content=3D"text/htm=
l; charset=3Dutf-8">

--bcaec52e622d7ce455049f30f08b--

--===============1956832988==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

--===============1956832988==--