Vladislav Bolkhovitin <email@example.com> writes:
> Jeff Moyer, on 08/05/2010 10:45 PM wrote:
>> Tejun Heo<firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>>> Commit a82afdf (block: use the same failfast bits for bio and request)
>>> moved BIO_RW_* bits around such that they match up with REQ_* bits.
>>> Unfortunately, fs.h hard coded READ, WRITE, READA and SWRITE as 0, 1,
>>> 2 and 3, and expected them to match with BIO_RW_* bits. READ/WRITE
>>> didn't change but BIO_RW_AHEAD was moved to bit 4 instead of bit 1,
>>> breaking READA and SWRITE.
>>> This patch updates READA and SWRITE such that they match the BIO_RW_*
>>> bits again. A follow up patch will update the definitions to directly
>>> use BIO_RW_* bits so that this kind of breakage won't happen again.
>>> Stable: The offending commit a82afdf was released with v2.6.32, so
>>> this patch should be applied to all kernels since then but it must
>>> _NOT_ be applied to kernels earlier than that.
>> Would someone be so kind as to remind me how this problem manifests
>> itself? I know I read this recently, but my memory and googling skills
>> are both failing me.
> See http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/7/28/315 and link inside.
Thanks a ton!
dm-devel mailing list