FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 09-24-2008, 11:45 PM
"Ateban"
 
Default Need Help

which Ubunut do i have to download if i have an
Intel 32 bit proccesor???? (vista)
*
and why in this guy's computer, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IlQGk0PcqbI*,appears
that screen, and on mines there is one windows*98
like??
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
 
Old 09-27-2008, 06:26 AM
Mario Vukelic
 
Default Need Help

On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 19:45 -0400, Ateban wrote:
> which Ubunut do i have to download if i have an Intel 32 bit
> proccesor???? (vista)

You want "Ubuntu 8.04 LTS Desktop Edition - Supported to 2011",
"Standard personal computer (x86 architecture, PentiumTM, CeleronTM,
AthlonTM, SempronTM)" from here http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/download

> and why in this guy's computer,
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IlQGk0PcqbI ,appears that screen, and
> on mines there is one windows 98 like??

What do you mean with "that screen" and that yours is "Windows 98 like".
Are you referring to the black initial installation screen with the
Ubuntu logo in the video? And is yours a blue and red text screen
instead?
If so, then you used the "Alternate" installation disc instead of the
"Desktop Edition" that he uses.


--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
 
Old 09-27-2008, 06:34 AM
Mario Vukelic
 
Default Need Help

On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 19:45 -0400, Ateban wrote:
> which Ubunut do i have to download if i have an Intel 32 bit
> proccesor???? (vista)
>
> and why in this guy's computer,
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IlQGk0PcqbI ,appears that screen, and
> on mines there is one windows 98 like??

Also, you probably want to read this:
https://help.ubuntu.com/8.04/installation-guide/i386/index.html
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Installation (also note the section at
the bottom with additional information, such as how to migrate data from
Windows)



--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
 
Old 02-01-2010, 01:21 AM
weizi
 
Default need help

Hi, I just*update my system to Ubuntu 9.10 and find that I could not connect internet. Could you help me solve this problem? Thanks a lot!
*
> From: ubuntu-users-request@lists.ubuntu.com
> Subject: ubuntu-users Digest, Vol 66, Issue 2
> To: ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 02:13:53 +0000
>
> Send ubuntu-users mailing list submissions to
> ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> ubuntu-users-request@lists.ubuntu.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> ubuntu-users-owner@lists.ubuntu.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of ubuntu-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Installing WIcd Using Ubuntu CD After NM Quit (anubis)
> 2. Re: Installing WIcd Using Ubuntu CD After NM Quit (steve reilly)
> 3. Re: Installing WIcd Using Ubuntu CD After NM Quit (Leonard)
> 4. Re: problem with setting up Xen networking (Amedee Van Gasse)
> 5. Re: Samba Password Authentication is failing (Tom H)
> 6. Re: Samba Password Authentication is failing (Tom H)
> 7. Re: Java not working in Firefox 3.6 (NoOp)
> 8. Re: Installing WIcd Using Ubuntu CD After NM Quit
> (Johnneylee Rollins)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 20:45:36 -0500
> From: anubis <darthanubis@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Installing WIcd Using Ubuntu CD After NM Quit
> To: "Ubuntu user technical support, not for general discussions"
> <ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com>
> Message-ID: <1264988736.5696.4.camel@proximo>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 19:34 -0600, Leonard wrote:
> > Would someone please tell me how to
> > install a package using the Karmic alt CD of from a booted up Karmic
> > using the alt CD with SS ticked to use the CD. Maybe need both for the
> > benefit of new users and old ones like me who still has a lot to
> > learn-) Many thanks,
> > --
> > Leonard
> > lenc5570@sbcglobal.net
> >
> >
>
> Use the laptops ethernet port to get online, then install applications?
> Can you pull an ip via the ethernet port at all?
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 197 bytes
> Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
> Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20100131/074ebe1f/attachment-0001.pgp
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 20:46:18 -0500
> From: steve reilly <sfreilly@roadrunner.com>
> Subject: Re: Installing WIcd Using Ubuntu CD After NM Quit
> To: "Ubuntu user technical support, not for general discussions"
> <ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com>
> Message-ID: <4B66326A.9040407@roadrunner.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Leonard wrote:
> The crick in my neck says I've been fighting to get wicd
> > installed for about 3 hours.
>
> i definately know that feeling..... not fun..
>
>
> Would someone please tell me how to
> > install a package using the Karmic alt CD of from a booted up Karmic
> > using the alt CD with SS ticked to use the CD. Maybe need both for the
> > benefit of new users and old ones like me who still has a lot to
> > learn-) Many thanks,
>
> this is an educated guess.... ive never had to install from the cdrom
> other than the first install........it appears you may still have the
> sources ticked for "download from the internet" above the cdrom option.
> if thats true, try unchecking those sources and anything that has to
> do with the net first before trying to use the cdrom source. post back
> with your findings.
>
>
> steve
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 19:51:48 -0600
> From: Leonard <lenc5570@sbcglobal.net>
> Subject: Re: Installing WIcd Using Ubuntu CD After NM Quit
> To: ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
> Message-ID: <hk5c3i$9dc$2@ger.gmane.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> anubis wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 19:34 -0600, Leonard wrote:
> >> Would someone please tell me how to
> >> install a package using the Karmic alt CD of from a booted up Karmic
> >> using the alt CD with SS ticked to use the CD. Maybe need both for the
> >> benefit of new users and old ones like me who still has a lot to
> >> learn-) Many thanks,
> >> --
> >> Leonard
> >> lenc5570@sbcglobal.net
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Use the laptops ethernet port to get online, then install applications?
> > Can you pull an ip via the ethernet port at all?
> >
> It's not a laptop but a desktop with wifi so I don't have to string
> cable. Tried NM setup several times before it was removed by trying to
> install wicd and couldn't get it to connect again at all.
>
> --
> Leonard
> lenc5570@sbcglobal.net
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 02:53:14 +0100
> From: Amedee Van Gasse <amedee-ubuntu@amedee.be>
> Subject: Re: problem with setting up Xen networking
> To: ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
> Message-ID: <4B66340A.8080304@amedee.be>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> On 01-02-10 02:36, Amedee Van Gasse wrote:
> > Hi peeps,
> >
> > I've been trying to set up bridged networking with Xen, and I've been
> > working so many hours on it that I need a frash pair of eyes. It's
> > probably a minor detail... but I can't find it.
> > The problem is that I have no network connection between Dom0 and DomU,
> > for example I can't ping between them. No iptables are used. It's
> > probably something with the bridge.
> >
> >
> > In Dom0:
> >
> > /etc/modules:
> > loop
> > dummy
> >
> >
> > /etc/network/interfaces:
> > auto lo
> > iface lo inet loopback
> >
> > allow-hotplug eth0
> > iface eth0 inet dhcp
> >
> > auto dummy0
> > iface dummy0 inet static
> > address 192.168.2.1
> > broadcast 192.168.2.255
> > netmask 255.255.255.0
> >
> >
> > /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp:
> > (network-script network-bridge)
> > (vif-script vif-bridge)
> >
> >
> > /etc/xen/mx1:
> > # -*- mode: python; -*-
> > root = "/dev/hda1 ro"
> > kernel = "/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.26-2-xen-686"
> > ramdisk = "/boot/initrd.img-2.6.26-2-xen-686"
> > memory = 128
> > name = "mx1"
> > vif = ['bridge=xenbr0']
> > disk =
> > ['phy:/dev/mapper/castor-mx1,hda1,w','phy:/dev/mapper/castor-swap_2,hda2,w']
> > ip="192.168.2.101"
> > netmask="255.255.255.0"
> > gateway="192.168.2.1"
> > hostname = "mx1"
> > root = "/dev/hda1 ro"
> > #extra = "3"
> > extra = "console=hvc0 xencons=tty"
> >
> >
> > ifconfig
> > dummy0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 16:72:f4:16:b3:7a
> > inet addr:192.168.2.1 Bcast:192.168.2.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> > inet6 addr: fe80::1472:f4ff:fe16:b37a/64 Scope:Link
> > UP BROADCAST RUNNING NOARP MTU:1500 Metric:1
> > RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> > TX packets:7 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> > RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:602 (602.0 B)
> >
> > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:30:48:db:31:00
> > inet addr:10.0.0.12 Bcast:10.0.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> > inet6 addr: fe80::230:48ff:fedb:3100/64 Scope:Link
> > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> > RX packets:380 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> > TX packets:272 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> > RX bytes:31099 (30.3 KiB) TX bytes:45640 (44.5 KiB)
> >
> > lo Link encap:Local Loopback
> > inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
> > inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
> > UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
> > RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> > TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> > RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)
> >
> > peth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:30:48:db:31:00
> > inet6 addr: fe80::230:48ff:fedb:3100/64 Scope:Link
> > UP BROADCAST RUNNING PROMISC MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> > RX packets:384 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> > TX packets:287 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> > collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
> > RX bytes:37207 (36.3 KiB) TX bytes:47546 (46.4 KiB)
> > Interrupt:16 Base address:0x4000
> >
> > vif2.0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> > inet6 addr: fe80::fcff:ffff:feff:ffff/64 Scope:Link
> > UP BROADCAST RUNNING PROMISC MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> > RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> > TX packets:87 errors:0 dropped:57 overruns:0 carrier:0
> > collisions:0 txqueuelen:32
> > RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:12253 (11.9 KiB)
> >
> >
> > In DomU:
> >
> > /etc/network/interfaces:
> > auto lo
> > iface lo inet loopback
> >
> > auto eth0
> > iface eth0 inet static
> > address 192.168.2.101
> > netmask 255.255.255.0
> > gateway 192.168.2.1
> >
> >
> > ifconfig
> > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:16:3e:1a:87:15
> > inet addr:192.168.2.101 Bcast:192.168.2.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> > RX packets:72 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> > TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> > collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
> > RX bytes:10427 (10.1 KiB) TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)
> >
> > lo Link encap:Local Loopback
> > inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
> > UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
> > RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> > TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> > RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)
> >
> >
> >
> > Just ask if I missed something.
> >
>
> Perhaps interesting to know:
>
> # brctl show
> bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
> eth0 8000.003048db3100 no peth0
> vif3.0
>
> I was expecting to see a xenbr0 bridge there, not eth0.
>
> --
> Amedee
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 03:00:22 +0100
> From: Tom H <tomh0665@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Samba Password Authentication is failing
> To: "Ubuntu user technical support, not for general discussions"
> <ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com>
> Message-ID:
> <6d4219cc1001311800s7341f01ax21a0d28b99839589@mail .gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> >>> This problem has been kicking my butt for a couple of days now. The
> >>> computer names are:
>
> >>> Linux: satan (Kubuntu)
> >>> Windows: lucifer (WinXP)
>
> >>> I want to mount Linux shares into "My Network Places" on Windows. My
> >>> username on both machines is "p". The security related directives
> >>> of the global section of smb.conf is:
>
> >>> ### security
> >>> ###
> >>> security = user
> >>> encrypt passwords = true
> >>> # passdb backend = smbpasswd:/etc/samba/smbpasswd
> >>> passdb backend = tdbsam:/var/lib/samba/passdb.tdb
> >>> browseable = true
>
> >>> If I set the security model to "share" with zero security everything
> >>> works fine: I can access the Linux shares from the Windows machine.
> >>> However, I'm trying to set this up correctly.
> >>
> >>> Double clicking a share icon on the Windows machine (i.e. when I try
> >>> to access a Linux share), I get a Win error pop-up:
> >>
> >>> "Satan mp is not accessible. You might not have permission to use
> >>> this network resource. Logon failure: unknown user name or bad
> >>> password"
> >>
> >>> On the Linux side, the log message says:
> >>> netbios connect: name1=SATAN name2=LUCIFER
> >>> netbios connect: local=satan remote=lucifer, name type = 0
> >>> setup_new_vc_session: New VC == 0, if NT4.x compatible we would close
> >>> all old resources.
> >>> Authentication for user [p] -> [p] FAILED with error NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD
> >>> Authentication for user [p] -> [p] FAILED with error NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD
> >>
> >>> However, the passwords *should* be the same. First, I verified that
> >>> my Linux Samba account exists using "pdbedit -Lv", and it looks good:
> >>
> >>> Unix username: p
> >>> NT username:
> >>> Account Flags: [U ]
> >>> Home Directory: satanp
> >>> Profile Path: satanpprofile
> >>> Domain: SATAN
> >>
> >>> # smbpasswd -D10 -c /etc/samba/smb.conf p
> >>
> >>> # ll /var/lib/samba/passdb.tdb
> >>> -rw------- 1 root root 36K 2010-01-30 15:06 /var/lib/samba/passdb.tdb
> >>
> >>> Everything looks correct and healthy.
>
> >> Are you trying to access "c: mp" on satan?
> >>
> >> What are your master browser settings in smb.conf? Have you tried to
> >> set the username in the Windows authentication box as
> >> "ipaddressofsatanp"?
> >
> > No, I'm sitting at a Windows machine trying to mount /tmp from Linux.
> >
> > The browser settings (wasn't 100% sure of this, but I think this is correct):
> > ? # Win Networking stuff
> > ? domain master ? ?= yes
> > ? local master ? ? = yes
> > ? preferred master = yes
> >
> > That was a good suggestion. ?I tried setting the username as
> > "ipOfSatanp" but it still didn't work.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 03:06:37 +0100
> From: Tom H <tomh0665@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Samba Password Authentication is failing
> To: "Ubuntu user technical support, not for general discussions"
> <ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com>
> Message-ID:
> <6d4219cc1001311806tae5664fm80500263d30524e0@mail. gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> > For reference:
> > Satan ? ?Linux ? ? ? 192.168.1.2
> > Lucifer ? WinXP ? 192.168.1.3
> >
> > Partial success. ? Now I'm more confused than ever because what's
> > happening contradicts what I think I know about windows networking.
> >
> > First of all, the two files
> >
> > ? ? ?C:WINDOWSsystem32driversetclmosts.sam
> > ? ? ?C:WINDOWSsystem32driversetchosts
> >
> > contain:
> >
> > ? ? 192.168.1.2 satan
> >
> > and as such, from Lucifer, I can "ping satan" and "ping 192.168.1.2"
> > successfully. ? That's no surprise.
>
> Please change lmosts.sam to lmhosts.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 18:06:55 -0800
> From: NoOp <glgxg@sbcglobal.net>
> Subject: Re: Java not working in Firefox 3.6
> To: ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
> Message-ID: <hk5d00$dp9$1@ger.gmane.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> On 01/31/2010 04:33 PM, Jim Byrnes wrote:
> > NoOp wrote:
> >> On 01/27/2010 05:14 PM, Jim Byrnes wrote:
> >> ...
> >>> OK, I'll take another look at Seamonkey when I get setup again. I had
> >>> made so many random changes to the system it was becoming a confusing
> >>> mess so I reformatted and re-installed Ubuntu. This time I know I may
> >>> have problems and will keep some notes.
> >>>
> >>> Regards, Jim
> >>>
> >>
> >> You might want to try:
> >> https://launchpad.net/~joe-nationnet/+archive/ppa-seamonkey2
> >> I've been testing for the past few days (see:
> >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461864) and the builds have been working
> >> well for me in both 32bit and 64bit.
> >>
> >> Instructions for adding the PPA as on the first link (click on '(Read
> >> about installing)'). Don't forget to add the PPA signature:
> >>
> >> $ sudo apt-key adv --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys A8F0C7B7
> >>
> >> Be aware that PPA's are "Personal Package Archives" and as such are
> >> *not* officially supported by Ubuntu. So use at your own discretion & be
> >> aware that the person posting PPA can easily pull off the files any time
> >> they wish (as was done by the Ubuntu OpenOffice.org maintainer awhile
> >> back with his OOo 3.x PPA's). That said, these are working well for me,
> >> along with my standard Mozilla 1.1.18, 2.0.2, and 2.0.3pre versions
> >> installed in my home folder. The usual precautions apply: back up your
> >> ~/.mozilla folder first.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > OK, thanks. Over the last couple of days I managed to get the launchpad
> > PPA's working and have installed the 64bit versions of Firefox 3.6 and
> > Thunderbird 3.0. I also managed to find the version of Lightning that
> > works with Thunderbird3.0. They seem to be working well. At first
> > Firefox had difficulty connecting to alot of sites but that was caused
> > by the way I had cookies setup. I'll have to do some more testing but
> > the 64bit version seems to handle cookies differently than the 32bit
> > version.
>
> ??? Say what? There is no difference (that I am aware of) in how 32bit
> versions handle cookies any differently than 64bit versions. I generally
> turn all cookies off unless they are required for loging into a site
> etc., BYMMV.
>
> So for now I think I will stay with the Firefox/Thunderbird combo.
>
> Probable a wise decision given that you actually did an entire reinstall
> of Ubuntu due to your efforts of adding mozilla programs. However, I
> hope that you do realize that whatever PPA's you used for the
> Thunderbird and Firefox installs are subject to the same warnings that I
> provided to you regarding SeaMonkey.
>
> Note: not meant as a slam... but I suggest that you simply stick to the
> standard Ubuntu repo versions of whatever you install. No clue either
> why you needed to use a PPA for Thunderbird or Firefox on a 64bit
> install... the supplied versions work quite well on the systems I've tested.
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 18:13:31 -0800
> From: Johnneylee Rollins <johnneylee.rollins@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Installing WIcd Using Ubuntu CD After NM Quit
> To: "Ubuntu user technical support, not for general discussions"
> <ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com>
> Message-ID:
> <150c3b491001311813w7dc7e0e4wb5054477a4728606@mail .gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> If you can, have you tried setting it in /etc/network/interfaces? Do
> you need to see an example?
>
> In /etc/network/interfaces:
> auto wlan0
> iface wlan0 inet dhcp
> wpa-conf /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf
>
> In /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf:
> network={
> ssid="ADD-YOUR-SSID-HERE"
> proto=RSN
> key_mgmt=WPA-PSK
> pairwise=CCMP TKIP
> group=CCMP TKIP
> psk="ADD-YOUR-WPA-PASSWORD-HERE"
> }
>
> sudo /etc/init.d/networking restart
>
> Or can you set up something like window's ICS, either with a cat6
> ethernet cable or a router or hub for ethernet?
>
> Let me know what's possible and I'll see what I can find. I've had
> many situations like this, especially since I couldn't get wireless
> drivers for my machines. No ethernet. Gah
>
> ~SpaceGhost
>
> >
> > --
> > ubuntu-users mailing list
> > ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
> > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> --
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
>
>
> End of ubuntu-users Digest, Vol 66, Issue 2
> *******************************************

Hotmail:Microsoft 强大的垃圾邮件防护技术,为您提供 *的电*邮件保障。 立即注册。
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
 
Old 02-01-2010, 06:08 AM
Nils Kassube
 
Default need help

weizi wrote:
> Hi, I just update my system to Ubuntu 9.10 and find that I could not
> connect internet. Could you help me solve this problem? Thanks a
> lot!

It is a bit difficult to guess what kind of internet connection you
have. Can you elaborate? Is it via dial-up modem, DSL router, WLAN,
cellular phone?

> > From: ubuntu-users-request@lists.ubuntu.com

Please don't include the entire digest. It isn't relevant for your
question.


Nils

--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
 
Old 02-01-2010, 08:42 AM
Jay Daniels
 
Default need help

On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 02:21 +0000, weizi wrote:
> Hi, I just update my system to Ubuntu 9.10 and find that I could not
> connect internet. Could you help me solve this problem? Thanks a lot!
>

Hidden wpa wifi? what type of connection?



jay



--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
 
Old 03-27-2010, 05:07 PM
cahit Eyigünlü
 
Default need help

Firstly my gateway 217.20.xxx.1



My ip adress 188.72.xxx.189



Sub net 255.255.255.0 this settings works on fedora 12
perfect but on centos* ubuntu freebsd or fedora core it is not working but
on all this systems i am able to use nat, i have installed linux again and
again thousands of time the given result from centos 5.4



Also as you could see there is no gateway of me on the
route table



*



Thanks for your help



*



[root@Lin3 ~]# ifconfig -a



eth0***** Link
encap:Ethernet* HWaddr 00:0C:29:0E:CD:B0*



**********inet
addr:188.72.xxx.189* Bcast:188.72.xxx.255* Mask:255.255.255.0



*********
inet6 addr: fe80::20c:29ff:fe0e:cdb0/64 Scope:Link



********* UP
BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST* MTU:1500* Metric:1



********* RX
packets:1168 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0



********* TX
packets:63 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0



*********
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000



**********RX
bytes:97464 (95.1 KiB)* TX bytes:11603 (11.3 KiB)



*********
Base address:0x2000 Memory:d8940000-d8960000



*



eth1***** Link
encap:Ethernet* HWaddr 00:0C:29:0E:CD:BA*



**********inet
addr:192.168.130.133* Bcast:192.168.130.255* Mask:255.255.255.0



*********
inet6 addr: fe80::20c:29ff:fe0e:cdba/64 Scope:Link



********* UP
BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST* MTU:1500* Metric:1



********* RX
packets:14 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0



********* TX
packets:80 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0



*********
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000



**********RX
bytes:2068 (2.0 KiB)* TX bytes:15191 (14.8 KiB)



*********
Base address:0x2080 Memory:d8960000-d8980000



*



lo******* Link
encap:Local Loopback*



**********inet
addr:127.0.0.1* Mask:255.0.0.0



*********
inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host



********* UP
LOOPBACK RUNNING* MTU:16436* Metric:1



********* RX
packets:8281 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0



********* TX
packets:8281 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0



*********
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0



**********RX
bytes:4840628 (4.6 MiB)* TX bytes:4840628 (4.6 MiB)



*



sit0***** Link
encap:IPv6-in-IPv4*



**********NOARP*
MTU:1480* Metric:1



********* RX
packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0



********* TX
packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0



*********
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0



**********RX
bytes:0 (0.0 b)* TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)



*



[root@Lin3 ~]# route -n



Kernel IP routing table



Destination****
Gateway********
Genmask******** Flags Metric
Ref*** Use Iface



192.168.130.0**
0.0.0.0********
255.255.255.0** U****
1***** 0******* 0
eth1



188.72.xxx.0***
0.0.0.0********
255.255.255.0** U****
1***** 0******* 0
eth0



[root@Lin3 ~]# service network restart



Bridged arabirimi
durduruluyor:****************** *********
[* TAMAM* ]



Nat arabirimi
durduruluyor:****************** *************
[* TAMAM* ]



loopback arayüzü
durduruluyor:****************** **********
[* TAMAM* ]



loopback arayüzü
etkinleştiriliyor:*************** ********
[* TAMAM* ]



Bridged arayüzü etkinleştiriliyor:* RTNETLINK
answers: Network is unreachable



************************* ************************* ********
[* TAMAM* ] Nat arayüzü etkinleştiriliyor:*



eth1 için IP bilgisi saptanıyor... bitti.



************************* ************************* ********
[* TAMAM* ]



[root@Lin3 ~]#


*



_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
Old 03-27-2010, 05:11 PM
Eero Volotinen
 
Default need help

2010/3/27 cahit Eyignl <cahit.eyigunlu@gmail.com>:
> Firstly my gateway 217.20.xxx.1
>
> My ip adress 188.72.xxx.189
>
> Sub net 255.255.255.0 this settings works on fedora 12 perfect but on
> centos* ubuntu freebsd or fedora core it is not working but on all this
> systems i am able to use nat, i have installed linux again and again
> thousands of time the given result from centos 5.4

echo "GATEWAY=217.20.xxx.1" >> /etc/sysconfig/network


--
Eero
--
Eero
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
Old 03-27-2010, 05:15 PM
cahit Eyignl
 
Default need help

please check the attachments fedora is working with the properties given, and nat is working also on cent os but bridged is not working i tryed Eero what you write but still netstat -rn is same and i could not ping my gateway*


2010/3/27 Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen@iki.fi>

2010/3/27 cahit Eyignl <cahit.eyigunlu@gmail.com>:

> Firstly my gateway 217.20.xxx.1

>

> My ip adress 188.72.xxx.189

>

> Sub net 255.255.255.0 this settings works on fedora 12 perfect but on

> centos* ubuntu freebsd or fedora core it is not working but on all this

> systems i am able to use nat, i have installed linux again and again

> thousands of time the given result from centos 5.4



echo "GATEWAY=217.20.xxx.1" >> /etc/sysconfig/network





--

Eero

--

Eero

_______________________________________________

CentOS mailing list

CentOS@centos.org

http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



login as: root
root@78.159.97.15's password:
Last login: Sat Mar 27 02:46:19 2010 from 212.253.233.143
root@lin [~]# ifconfig
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0C:29:27:73:A8
inet addr:78.159.97.15 Bcast:78.159.97.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::20c:29ff:fe27:73a8/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:33341414 errors:2409 dropped:5344 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:22285968 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:479420277 (457.2 MiB) TX bytes:3286848027 (3.0 GiB)
Interrupt:19 Base address:0x2000

lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:216475 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:216475 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:42560827 (40.5 MiB) TX bytes:42560827 (40.5 MiB)

root@lin [~]# netstat -rn
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
217.20.117.1 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth0
78.159.97.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
0.0.0.0 217.20.117.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0



[root@lin2 ~]# service network restart
eth0 arabirimi durduruluyor: [ TAMAM ]
Geridn arayz durduruluyor: [ TAMAM ]
A parametreleri ayarlanyor: [ TAMAM ]
Geridn arayz etkinletiriliyor: [ TAMAM ]
eth0 arayz etkinletiriliyor: [ TAMAM ]
[root@lin2 ~]# ifconfig
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0C:29:20:C0:28
inet addr:188.72.255.190 Bcast:188.72.255.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::20c:29ff:fe20:c028/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:1109 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:30 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:83430 (81.4 KiB) TX bytes:1652 (1.6 KiB)
Interrupt:193 Base address:0x2024

lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:2884 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:2884 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:4985288 (4.7 MiB) TX bytes:4985288 (4.7 MiB)

[root@lin2 ~]# netstat -rn
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
188.72.255.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
[root@lin2 ~]# ping 217.20.117.1
connect: Network is unreachable




root@lin2 ~]# service network restart
eth0 arabirimi durduruluyor: [ TAMAM ]
Geridn arayz durduruluyor: [ TAMAM ]
A parametreleri ayarlanyor: [ TAMAM ]
Geridn arayz etkinletiriliyor: [ TAMAM ]
eth0 arayz etkinletiriliyor: [ TAMAM ]
[root@lin2 ~]# ifconfig
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0C:29:20:C0:28
inet addr:192.168.130.134 Bcast:192.168.130.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::20c:29ff:fe20:c028/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:2385 errors:1837443 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:73 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:185779 (181.4 KiB) TX bytes:4806 (4.6 KiB)
Interrupt:193 Base address:0x2024

lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:2884 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:2884 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:4985288 (4.7 MiB) TX bytes:4985288 (4.7 MiB)

[root@lin2 ~]# netstat -rn
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
192.168.130.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
0.0.0.0 192.168.130.2 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
[root@lin2 ~]# ping 217.20.117.1
PING 217.20.117.1 (217.20.117.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 217.20.117.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=128 time=3.20 ms
64 bytes from 217.20.117.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=128 time=3.67 ms
64 bytes from 217.20.117.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=128 time=3.67 ms
64 bytes from 217.20.117.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=128 time=3.68 ms_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
Old 03-27-2010, 05:48 PM
John R Pierce
 
Default need help

cahit Eyignl wrote:
>
> Firstly my gateway 217.20.xxx.1
>
> My ip adress 188.72.xxx.189
>

there's something you're not telling us here, as the gateway has to be
reachable via a network, and 217.20.xxx.1 is not part of either network
shown in your route or ifconfig output.



_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 04:50 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org