512K readahead size with thrashing safe readahead
FYI, wanted to get this on our radar... seems latest DM isn't allowing
RFC readahead code to set a sane readahead default for DM devices?
get_capacity() is returning 0 for DM devices (not just multipath).
Vivek did share that fdisk -l does show the proper capacity for the DM
I haven't had a chance to look at the relevant code yet.
I've asked Vivek to cc dm-devel on any further messages he might send
in response to this thread.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Vivek Goyal <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 10:58 AM
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] [RFC] 512K readahead size with thrashing
To: Wu Fengguang <email@example.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Jens Axboe
<email@example.com>, Peter Zijlstra <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <email@example.com>,
"firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>, LKML
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 10:24:54AM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 02:27:56PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > Vivek,
> > On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 06:38:03AM +0800, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 11:28:35PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > > > Andrew,
> > > >
> > > > This is to lift default readahead size to 512KB, which I believe yields
> > > > more I/O throughput without noticeably increasing I/O latency for today's HDD.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Hi Fengguang,
> > >
> > > I was doing a quick test with the patches. I was using fio to run some
> > > sequential reader threads. I have got one access to one Lun from an HP
> > > EVA. In my case it looks like with the patches throughput has come down.
> > Thank you for the quick testing!
> > This patchset does 3 things:
> > 1) 512K readahead size
> > 2) new readahead algorithms
> > 3) new readahead tracing/stats interfaces
> > (1) will impact performance, while (2) _might_ impact performance in
> > case of bugs.
> > Would you kindly retest the patchset with readahead size manually set
> > to 128KB? *That would help identify the root cause of the performance
> > drop:
> > * * * * DEV=sda
> > * * * * echo 128 > /sys/block/$DEV/queue/read_ahead_kb
> I have got two paths to the HP EVA and got multipath device setup(dm-3). I
> noticed with vanilla kernel read_ahead_kb=128 after boot but with your patches
> applied it is set to 4. So looks like something went wrong with device
> size/capacity detection hence wrong defaults. Manually setting
> read_ahead_kb=512, got me better performance as compare to vanilla kernel.
I put a printk in add_disk and noticed that for multipath device
get_capacity() is returning 0 and that's why ra_pages is being set to
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to firstname.lastname@example.org. *For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"email@example.com"> firstname.lastname@example.org </a>
dm-devel mailing list
|All times are GMT. The time now is 08:05 AM.|
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.