+static struct dm_snap_pending_exception *
+lookup_pending_exception(struct dm_snapshot *s, chunk_t chunk)
+{
+ struct dm_snap_exception *e = lookup_exception(&s->pending, chunk);
+
+ if (e)
+ return container_of(e, struct dm_snap_pending_exception, e);
+
+ return NULL;
+}
+
/*
* Looks to see if this snapshot already has a pending exception
* for this chunk, otherwise it allocates a new one and inserts
@@ -983,21 +994,10 @@ static void start_copy(struct dm_snap_pe
static struct dm_snap_pending_exception *
__find_pending_exception(struct dm_snapshot *s, struct bio *bio)
{
- struct dm_snap_exception *e;
- struct dm_snap_pending_exception *pe;
+ struct dm_snap_pending_exception *pe, *pe2;
chunk_t chunk = sector_to_chunk(s, bio->bi_sector);
/*
- * Is there a pending exception for this already ?
- */
- e = lookup_exception(&s->pending, chunk);
- if (e) {
- /* cast the exception to a pending exception */
- pe = container_of(e, struct dm_snap_pending_exception, e);
- goto out;
- }
-
- /*
* Create a new pending exception, we don't want
* to hold the lock while we do this.
*/
@@ -1010,11 +1010,10 @@ __find_pending_exception(struct dm_snaps
return NULL;
}
- e = lookup_exception(&s->pending, chunk);
- if (e) {
+ pe2 = lookup_pending_exception(s, chunk);
+ if (pe2) {
free_pending_exception(pe);
- pe = container_of(e, struct dm_snap_pending_exception, e);
- goto out;
+ return pe2;
}
@@ -1083,11 +1081,14 @@ static int snapshot_map(struct dm_target
* writeable.
*/
if (bio_rw(bio) == WRITE) {
- pe = __find_pending_exception(s, bio);
+ pe = lookup_pending_exception(s, chunk);
if (!pe) {
- __invalidate_snapshot(s, -ENOMEM);
- r = -EIO;
- goto out_unlock;
+ pe = __find_pending_exception(s, bio);
+ if (!pe) {
+ __invalidate_snapshot(s, -ENOMEM);
+ r = -EIO;
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
}
remap_exception(s, &pe->e, bio, chunk);
@@ -1217,10 +1218,13 @@ static int __origin_write(struct list_he
if (e)
goto next_snapshot;
- pe = __find_pending_exception(snap, bio);
+ pe = lookup_pending_exception(snap, chunk);
if (!pe) {
- __invalidate_snapshot(snap, -ENOMEM);
- goto next_snapshot;
+ pe = __find_pending_exception(snap, bio);
+ if (!pe) {
+ __invalidate_snapshot(snap, -ENOMEM);
+ goto next_snapshot;
+ }
}
if (!primary_pe) {
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
02-25-2009, 04:58 PM
Mikulas Patocka
check for completed exception after dropped lock
We need to check if the exception was completed after dropping the lock.
After regaining the lock, __find_pending_exception checks if the exception
was already placed into &s->pending hash.
But we don't check if the exception was already completed and placed into
&s->complete hash. If the process waiting in alloc_pending_exception was
delayed at this point because of a scheduling latency and the exception
was meanwhile completed, we'd miss that and allocate another pending
exception for already completed chunk.
It will lead to a situation when two records for the same chunk exist and
it could lead to data corruption because multiple snapshot I/Os to the
affected chunk could be redirected to different locations in the snapshot.