Mark device-mapper as Supported in MAINTAINERS file.

Signed-off-by: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de>

---

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 474ec0c..cd73850 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -1387,7 +1387,7 @@ DEVICE-MAPPER (LVM)
P: Alasdair Kergon
L: dm-devel@redhat.com
W: http://sources.redhat.com/dm
-S: Maintained
+S: Supported

DIGI INTL. EPCA DRIVER
P: Digi International, Inc

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 10:05:41AM +0530, Nikanth Karthikesan wrote:
> Mark device-mapper as Supported in MAINTAINERS file.

Supported: Someone is actually paid to look after this.
Maintained: Someone actually looks after it.

Both of those apply and I would argue that, given the use of the word
'actually' in those definitions, 'Maintained' is better than 'Supported'.

Alasdair
--
agk@redhat.com

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

On Thursday 05 March 2009 23:37:11 Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 10:05:41AM +0530, Nikanth Karthikesan wrote:
> > Mark device-mapper as Supported in MAINTAINERS file.
>
> Supported: Someone is actually paid to look after this.
> Maintained: Someone actually looks after it.
>
> Both of those apply and I would argue that, given the use of the word
> 'actually' in those definitions, 'Maintained' is better than 'Supported'.
>

I think that 'Supported' is a superset of 'Maintained'.

In general the list looks like specifies the 'status' from maximum support to
nothing. Supported > Maintained > Odd Fixes > Orphan > Obsolete ?

Thanks
Nikanth

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel