Can I configure priority?
Alternatively, if we use 'failover' instead, is there a way to have DM
use the HBA as the main interface and only failover to ETH when
necessary?
Thanks,
Scott
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 1:08 PM, Scott Moseman <scmoseman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> RHEL v5
> eth + hba
>
> If I'm using 'multibus' for my 'path_grouping_policy' in order to
> utilize all of the channels, is there any way to prioritize how the 2
> interfaces are used? For instance, if we prefer to have the traffic,
> when the bandwidth doesn't exceed a single channel, using the HBA
> first and ETH second? How does DM determine which interface to use in
> low bandwidth situations?
>
> Thanks,
> Scott
>
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
|
