Looking for an emacs replacement
 

Are you using GNU emacs? Then how about Xemacs (formely Lucid emacs)?

or vice-versa.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120925191858.GA26155@debian

Looking for an emacs replacement
 

On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Jon Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> wrote:
>
> Are you using GNU emacs? Then how about Xemacs (formely Lucid emacs)?

Actually, i guess somebody should bring up SXemacs.

This variant has lots of goodies in it (e.g., quaternion support and lots of
other stuff you wouldn't expect in an editor) and discards all legacy not
needed for unix, iirc.

dan

>
> or vice-versa.
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120925191858.GA26155@debian
>


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOphizKBqr7_W7p_C1SrrQLM=gCJPoTb=PbQzFrjsh_u5XPKK A@mail.gmail.com