I am not really sure this is the correct newsletter* for* my question, if not please apologize me and suggest me a right newsletter, thanks.
*
My goal is to simulate more than one IP interface using just a physical interface, for do that I tried using this alias
*
Ifconfing ethX:1 <IP>
*
But when I try to send a packet over that interface I see the IP source the same as the original, and real,* Ethernet interface. Then I tried to use TAP interface but I was unable to “link” them with my physical one, I notice them can communicate
each others but can not ping (ping –I tap0* <ip real IF>) the original one.
It is still valid if I create a bridge with all them.
*
I would like avoid to install many Virtual Box as I need but what I want is exactly what it do: build a new virtual interface and bridge it with a real one in order to have more IP interface attached at one physical.
*
Any suggestion ?
*
Thanks in advance,
Pietro.
09-19-2012, 02:30 PM
Chris Davies
Configure Virtual IP interfaces
Pietro Paolini <P.Paolini@ext.adbglobal.com> wrote:
> My goal is to simulate more than one IP interface using just a physical
> interface, for do that I tried using this alias - ifconfing ethX:1 <IP>
"ethX" is your real interface, yes?
> But when I try to send a packet over that interface I see the IP source
> the same as the original, and real, Ethernet interface.
It depends where you're trying to send it to.
Consider this addressing:
eth0 192.168.1.1
eth0:1 172.16.2.2
Then ping 172.16.2.4 will use 172.16.2.2 as source address, and ping
192.168.1.6 will use 192.168.1.1 as the source address.
Chris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 2h1pi9x12m.ln2@news.roaima.co.uk">http://lists.debian.org/2h1pi9x12m.ln2@news.roaima.co.uk
09-19-2012, 05:32 PM
Camalen
Configure Virtual IP interfaces
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 15:40:24 +0000, Pietro Paolini wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi :-)
(people, avoid sending html formatted posts, they are really annoying to
deal with...)
> My goal is to simulate more than one IP interface using just a physical
> interface, for do that I tried using this alias
>
> Ifconfing ethX:1 <IP>
More information about virtual interfaces can be found here:
> But when I try to send a packet over that interface I see the IP source
> the same as the original, and real, Ethernet interface.
That sounds logic because there is only "one" real interface handling the
traffic.
> Then I tried to use TAP interface but I was unable to "link" them with
> my physical one, I notice them can communicate each others but can not
> ping (ping -I tap0 <ip real IF>) the original one. It is still valid
> if I create a bridge with all them.
>
> I would like avoid to install many Virtual Box as I need but what I want
> is exactly what it do: build a new virtual interface and bridge it with
> a real one in order to have more IP interface attached at one physical.
>
> Any suggestion ?
Mmm... I'm not sure to have properly understood your main goal here. Can
you please detail what's what you want to get?
Greetings,
--
Camalen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/k3cvjq$s2t$15@ger.gmane.org
09-20-2012, 08:11 PM
Pedro Eugênio Rocha
Configure Virtual IP interfaces
Pietro,
Can you send us the output of "ifconfig" and "route -n"? Maybe this way
it would be easier for us understanding what you're trying to do.
Best,
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Pietro Paolini
<P.Paolini@ext.adbglobal.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I am not really sure this is the correct newsletter for my question, if
> not please apologize me and suggest me a right newsletter, thanks.
>
>
>
> My goal is to simulate more than one IP interface using just a physical
> interface, for do that I tried using this alias
>
>
>
> Ifconfing ethX:1 <IP>
>
>
>
> But when I try to send a packet over that interface I see the IP source the
> same as the original, and real, Ethernet interface. Then I tried to use TAP
> interface but I was unable to “link” them with my physical one, I notice
> them can communicate each others but can not ping (ping –I tap0 <ip real
> IF>) the original one.
>
> It is still valid if I create a bridge with all them.
>
>
>
> I would like avoid to install many Virtual Box as I need but what I want is
> exactly what it do: build a new virtual interface and bridge it with a real
> one in order to have more IP interface attached at one physical.
>
>
>
> Any suggestion ?
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Pietro.
>
>
>
>
--
Pedro Eugênio Rocha
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAM3FfDy9Mq6E_WLAGPsAMJ16m_6NtgL9vpbMAYßUkJjRÕg@ mail.gmail.com