Re (2): An inline bitmap in an HTML file.
 

From: Manuel Cremer <Ma_Sys.ma@web.de>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 23:38:20 +0200
> Although I do not know why this should be debian-related, ...

True enough, it isn't. At the time there seemed a small
chance it was an iceweasel problem and in any case, many
sharp people read this list.

> it must be
> type="img/png" data="data:image/png;base64,

Specifying the type and then specifying it again in the
data is counter-intuitive. It must be an idiosyncracy of
the syntax.

Thanks! ... Peter E.




--
123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 12
Telephone +13606390202. Bcc: peter at easthope.ca http://carnot.yi.org/
"http://members.shaw.ca/peasthope/index.html#Itinerary "


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/171057615.79237.28793@cantor.invalid

Re (2): An inline bitmap in an HTML file.
 

From: Camaleon <noelamac@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:19:25 +0000 (UTC)
> ... really mean you were not aware that there existed the
> <img> tag for displaying images in html?

Used <img border= ...> in many places. In this instance
I became so preoccupied with transforming the example
to my case, that <img> didn't cross my mind. "Tunnel vision"
or "tunnel thinking".

Incidentally,
http://members.shaw.ca/peasthope/Category2.html#Product0x0Test0
has two artifacts which are noticeable on comparison with
http://members.shaw.ca/peasthope/Category2.xhtml .
I used convert from Imagemagick to make the png from the svg.

Regards, ... Peter E.

--
123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 12
Telephone +13606390202. Bcc: peter at easthope.ca http://carnot.yi.org/
"http://members.shaw.ca/peasthope/index.html#Itinerary "


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/171057617.44073.26244@cantor.invalid

Re (2): An inline bitmap in an HTML file.
 

On 08/17/2012 08:48 PM, peasthope@shaw.ca wrote:
> From: Camaleon <noelamac@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:19:25 +0000 (UTC)
>> ... really mean you were not aware that there existed the
>> <img> tag for displaying images in html?
>
> Used <img border= ...> in many places. In this instance
> I became so preoccupied with transforming the example
> to my case, that <img> didn't cross my mind. "Tunnel vision"
> or "tunnel thinking".
>
> Incidentally,
> http://members.shaw.ca/peasthope/Category2.html#Product0x0Test0
> has two artifacts which are noticeable on comparison with
> http://members.shaw.ca/peasthope/Category2.xhtml .
> I used convert from Imagemagick to make the png from the svg.

I did not try this with your SVG graphics as I did not bother to extract
them from the XHTML source but you could probably try librsvg2-bin. The
command rsvg [source] [destination] easily converts SVG to PNG. I also
had some problems with convert's SVG rendering. It was too slow for my
300 MiB svg file and I found that rsvg did this much faster (and also
used a lot more RAM).

>
> Regards, ... Peter E.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 502EA0E8.6020909@web.de">http://lists.debian.org/502EA0E8.6020909@web.de

Re (2): An inline bitmap in an HTML file.
 

On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 10:48:41 -0800, peasthope wrote:

> From: Camaleon <noelamac@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:19:25 +0000 (UTC)
>> ... really mean you were not aware that there existed the <img> tag for
>> displaying images in html?
>
> Used <img border= ...> in many places. In this instance I became so
> preoccupied with transforming the example to my case, that <img> didn't
> cross my mind. "Tunnel vision" or "tunnel thinking".

Ha. Yes... that happens :-)

> Incidentally,
> http://members.shaw.ca/peasthope/Category2.html#Product0x0Test0 has two
> artifacts which are noticeable on comparison with
> http://members.shaw.ca/peasthope/Category2.xhtml . I used convert from
> Imagemagick to make the png from the svg.

To keep things as simple as possible, instead PNG (or SVG) I would go for
a GIF image format to avoid having problems with web browsers. Also,
remember that <img> tag is an element that usually degrades quite well
even when using text based browsers.

Greetings,

--
Camaleón


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/k0orj3$ct$7@ger.gmane.org