Discovered multiple short term, 5-10 secs, hidden processes appearing on my system - Linux localhost 2.6.24-1-amd64 #1 SMP Thu Mar 27 16:52:38 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux. Checked logs. Checked PC with top, htop, ps and then system rkhunter and chkrootkit . Also tried rkhunter and chkrootkit from a livecd. In all checks no problems found. Intermittently these processes stop.
So not sure if this is some sort of false positive or if it is something that evades rootkit checks and I have a problem.
*
Anyway I'm going to wipe my installation and start again as a precaution but if anyone has any opinions what's going on I'd be interested to read.
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 12:35:28AM +0100, Robin wrote:
> Discovered multiple short term, 5-10 secs, hidden processes appearing on my
> system - Linux localhost 2.6.24-1-amd64 #1 SMP Thu Mar 27 16:52:38 UTC 2008
> x86_64 GNU/Linux. Checked logs. Checked PC with top, htop, ps and then
> system rkhunter and chkrootkit . Also tried rkhunter and chkrootkit from a
> livecd. In all checks no problems found. Intermittently these processes
> stop.
If they are hidden, how do you see them?
What exactly is the command you run? What is the output?
--
Tzafrir Cohen | tzafrir@jabber.org | VIM is
http://tzafrir.org.il | | a Mutt's
tzafrir@cohens.org.il | | best
ICQ# 16849754 | | friend
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
On 13/04/2008, Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir@cohens.org.il> wrote:
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 12:35:28AM +0100, Robin wrote:
> Discovered multiple short term, 5-10 secs, hidden processes appearing on my
> system - Linux localhost 2.6.24-1-amd64 #1 SMP Thu Mar 27 16:52:38 UTC 2008
> x86_64 GNU/Linux. Checked logs. Checked PC with top, htop, ps and then
> system rkhunter and chkrootkit . Also tried rkhunter and chkrootkit from a
> livecd. In all checks no problems found. Intermittently these processes
> stop.
If they are hidden, how do you see them?
What exactly is the command you run? What is the output?
--
Tzafrir Cohen******** | tzafrir@jabber.org | VIM is
http://tzafrir.org.il |********************| a Mutt's
tzafrir@cohens.org.il |********************|**best
ICQ# 16849754******** |********************| friend
Noticed that cpu running at 15% with no user applications running. Checked top which reported nothing running at that level. Ran:
unhide proc :- Which gives intermittent hidden processes
unhide sys* :-*[*]Searching for Hidden processes through getsid() scanning
******************************* Found HIDDEN PID: 16356
**************************
**************************[*]Searching for Hidden processes through sched_getscheduler() scanning
******************************* Found HIDDEN PID: 17408
unhide brute :-[*]Starting scanning using brute force against PIDS
******************************* Found HIDDEN PID: 2216
******************************* Found HIDDEN PID: 2503
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 02:41:55PM +0100, Robin wrote:
> unhide proc :- Which gives intermittent hidden processes
> unhide sys :-[*]Searching for Hidden processes through getsid() scanning
> Found HIDDEN PID: 16356
>[*]Searching for Hidden processes through sched_getscheduler() scanning
> Found HIDDEN PID: 17408
> unhide brute :-[*]Starting scanning using brute force against PIDS
> Found HIDDEN PID: 2216
> Found HIDDEN PID: 2503
You could also try
netatst -anp|less
unhide-tcp
If someone hacked the box, probably a net process was used to enter and
new net processes are spanned.
--
Chi usa software non libero avvelena anche te. Digli di smettere.
Informatica=arsenico: minime dosi in rari casi patologici, altrimenti letale.
Informatica=bomba: intelligente solo per gli stupidi che ci credono.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
On 13/04/2008, NN_il_Confusionario <pinkof.pallus@tiscalinet.it> wrote:
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 02:41:55PM +0100, Robin wrote:
> unhide proc :- Which gives intermittent hidden processes
> unhide sys**:-**[*]Searching for Hidden processes through getsid() scanning
>******************************** Found HIDDEN PID: 16356
>****************[*]Searching for Hidden processes through sched_getscheduler() scanning
>******************************** Found HIDDEN PID: 17408
> unhide brute :-[*]Starting scanning using brute force against PIDS
>******************************** Found HIDDEN PID: 2216
>******************************** Found HIDDEN PID: 2503
You could also try
netatst -anp|less
unhide-tcp
If someone hacked the box, probably a net process was used to enter and
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 05:31:53PM +0100, Robin wrote:
> On 13/04/2008, NN_il_Confusionario <pinkof.pallus@tiscalinet.it> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 02:41:55PM +0100, Robin wrote:
> > > unhide proc :- Which gives intermittent hidden processes
> > > unhide sys :-[*]Searching for Hidden processes through getsid()
> > scanning
> > > Found HIDDEN PID: 16356
> > >[*]Searching for Hidden processes through
> > sched_getscheduler() scanning
> > > Found HIDDEN PID: 17408
> > > unhide brute :-[*]Starting scanning using brute force against PIDS
> > > Found HIDDEN PID: 2216
> > > Found HIDDEN PID: 2503
> >
> >
> > You could also try
> > netatst -anp|less
> > unhide-tcp
> >
> > If someone hacked the box, probably a net process was used to enter and
> > new net processes are spanned.
> >
> > Moreover:
> >
> > apt-cache search forensic
> >
> > Linkname: Securing Debian Manual
> > URL: http://www.debian.org/doc/user-manuals#securing
> >
> > might give further ideas
I downloaded this and installed it, just to try (unhide) and it found
lots of hidden processes through unhide sys.
different pids each time. so i ran this
>/tmp/thelist; for x in $(seq 1 2000); do echo 1 >/dev/null & echo $! >> /tmp/thelist ; done
out of curiosity, it did not miss a pid, which makes me think unhide
raises a lot of false positives ?
--
18th Rule of Friendship:
A friend will let you hold the ladder while he goes up on the roof
to install your new aerial, which is the biggest son-of-a-bitch you
ever saw.
-- Esquire, May 1977
On 13/04/2008, Alex Samad <alex@samad.com.au> wrote:
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 05:31:53PM +0100, Robin wrote:
> On 13/04/2008, NN_il_Confusionario <pinkof.pallus@tiscalinet.it> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 02:41:55PM +0100, Robin wrote:
> > > unhide proc :- Which gives intermittent hidden processes
> > > unhide sys**:-**[*]Searching for Hidden processes through getsid()
> > scanning
> > >******************************** Found HIDDEN PID: 16356
> > >****************[*]Searching for Hidden processes through
> > sched_getscheduler() scanning
> > >******************************** Found HIDDEN PID: 17408
> > > unhide brute :-[*]Starting scanning using brute force against PIDS
> > >******************************** Found HIDDEN PID: 2216
> > >******************************** Found HIDDEN PID: 2503
> >
> >
> > You could also try
> > netatst -anp|less
> > unhide-tcp
> >
> > If someone hacked the box, probably a net process was used to enter and
> > new net processes are spanned.
> >
> > Moreover:
> >