Backports on Squeeze OT question/issue
On 20120702_144837, Camaleón wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Jul 2012 02:15:42 +0200, Mark Panen wrote: > > > Is it safe to have backports enabled on a stable Squeeze 6.05 system? > > I'd say now is even safer than before because the backported packages are > integrated within the official repositories which should lead to less > packages/libraries collisions. > > Just use it with caution and consider a correct pinning if you are > planing of making an intensive use of them. > > Greetings, > > -- > Camaleón > > This comment is addressed to this thread because it is a question that has puzzled me about squeeze-backports. I know that one must do a special thing, namely -t option in order to actually download and install a backported package, but how does one know of the existance of a backported package. For packages in the general main/squeeze grouping, I have browsed the interactive user interface of Aptitude. Do the backports show up there if I add the line to my sources.list? If no, where do I browse? If yes, how do I know that they are somehow special, and that I need to do more than typing a simple + to select them? The answer may be obvious and innately intuitive, but I have found from experience, intuitive is something that I was told long ago and not remembered until presented with an actual example. I don't think I have been told how to intuit the answers here. -- Paul E Condon pecondon@mesanetworks.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org Archive: 20120702160949.GA20885@big.lan.gnu">http://lists.debian.org/20120702160949.GA20885@big.lan.gnu |
Backports on Squeeze OT question/issue
On Mon, 02 Jul 2012 10:09:49 -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
> On 20120702_144837, Camaleón wrote: >> On Mon, 02 Jul 2012 02:15:42 +0200, Mark Panen wrote: >> >> > Is it safe to have backports enabled on a stable Squeeze 6.05 system? >> >> I'd say now is even safer than before because the backported packages >> are integrated within the official repositories which should lead to >> less packages/libraries collisions. >> >> Just use it with caution and consider a correct pinning if you are >> planing of making an intensive use of them. > This comment is addressed to this thread because it is a question that > has puzzled me about squeeze-backports. I know that one must do a > special thing, namely -t option in order to actually download and > install a backported package, For installing single packages, yes, "-t" should be enough. Otherwise, pinning (prioritize backports over the standard repositories) should be more convenient. > but how does one know of the existance of a backported package. As usual, you go to the online search and type the name of the package. If there's a backport counterpart it will listed there. You can also query from here: http://backports-master.debian.org/Packages/ > For packages in the general main/squeeze grouping, I have browsed the > interactive user interface of Aptitude. Do the backports show up there > if I add the line to my sources.list? If no, where do I browse? If yes, > how do I know that they are somehow special, and that I need to do more > than typing a simple + to select them? (...) I don't use the backport repositories but I guess yes, if you have it listed in your "sources.list" the queries (e.g., apt-search) should also provide the versions of the packages available in the backports. Anyway, I prefer to use the web search instead, I feel more confortable with the online interface where I can get extra information for the packages. Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jssm2r$4gd$17@dough.gmane.org |
Backports on Squeeze OT question/issue
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 05:34:19PM +0000, Camaleón wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Jul 2012 10:09:49 -0600, Paul E Condon wrote: > > but how does one know of the existance of a backported package. > > As usual, you go to the online search and type the name of the package. > If there's a backport counterpart it will listed there. > > You can also query from here: > > http://backports-master.debian.org/Packages/ Are you supposed to do this daily, or what? He means it being a push operation not a pull operation. No doubt he already knows about querying for himself at http://backports-master.debian.org/Packages/ -- "If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing." --- Malcolm X -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120702223802.GM21342@tal |
Backports on Squeeze OT question/issue
On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 10:38:02 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 05:34:19PM +0000, Camaleón wrote: >> On Mon, 02 Jul 2012 10:09:49 -0600, Paul E Condon wrote: >> > but how does one know of the existance of a backported package. >> >> As usual, you go to the online search and type the name of the package. >> If there's a backport counterpart it will listed there. >> >> You can also query from here: >> >> http://backports-master.debian.org/Packages/ > > Are you supposed to do this daily, or what? To do what? Search for a package in the backports? That would depend on your needings, I personally do a few software installs in my systems so yes, when I need to search for a package I use the online interface. > He means it being a push operation not a pull operation. No doubt he > already knows about querying for himself at > http://backports-master.debian.org/Packages/ What do you suggest then? Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jsuu64$q1u$9@dough.gmane.org |
Backports on Squeeze OT question/issue
On 20120703_103802, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 05:34:19PM +0000, Camaleón wrote: > > On Mon, 02 Jul 2012 10:09:49 -0600, Paul E Condon wrote: > > > but how does one know of the existance of a backported package. > > > > As usual, you go to the online search and type the name of the package. > > If there's a backport counterpart it will listed there. > > > > You can also query from here: > > > > http://backports-master.debian.org/Packages/ > > Are you supposed to do this daily, or what? > > He means it being a push operation not a pull operation. No doubt he > already knows about querying for himself at > http://backports-master.debian.org/Packages/ > Let me join in the discussion of what I intended by my badly worded request: 1. I need a way of learning the name of the package that might help with some problem, a place on the web where I can pick up search terms on a topic with which I am not familiar. At the beginning of my search, I simply don't know what to type in the search box. In the particular case of backports of packages that I am already using and are serving me well enough as is, but might have a backport that is actually much better, how do I discover that backport? But more likely situation is that I have tried and found wanting the package in the original release, but would revisit the issue if I knew their was a backport. Tracking backports of software that I am somehow able to live without is not something to which I can allot much time. But I might be missing out on some really neat stuff. 2. If I do decide to put squeeze-backports in my sources.list, will the backported packages be displayed in the interactive browser? 3. If they are displayed in interactive mode, will I be able to tell that they are backports? (so that I can exercise that extra caution that has been recommended in this thread) These are questions that are quite low priority because I am generally quite satisfied with the pace of development in Debian. If the answers indicate that using backports is not for me, I'll not complain. Thanks :-) -- Paul E Condon pecondon@mesanetworks.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org Archive: 20120703181738.GA16185@big.lan.gnu">http://lists.debian.org/20120703181738.GA16185@big.lan.gnu |
Backports on Squeeze OT question/issue
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 12:17:39PM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
.......snip...... > > Let me join in the discussion of what I intended by my badly > worded request: > > 1. I need a way of learning the name of the package that might help > with some problem, a place on the web where I can pick up search terms > on a topic with which I am not familiar. At the beginning of my > search, I simply don't know what to type in the search box. In the > particular case of backports of packages that I am already using > and are serving me well enough as is, but might have a backport that > is actually much better, how do I discover that backport? But more > likely situation is that I have tried and found wanting the package > in the original release, but would revisit the issue if I knew their > was a backport. Tracking backports of software that I am somehow > able to live without is not something to which I can allot much time. > But I might be missing out on some really neat stuff. > > 2. If I do decide to put squeeze-backports in my sources.list, will > the backported packages be displayed in the interactive browser? > > 3. If they are displayed in interactive mode, will I be able to tell > that they are backports? (so that I can exercise that extra caution > that has been recommended in this thread) > > These are questions that are quite low priority because I am generally > quite satisfied with the pace of development in Debian. If the > answers indicate that using backports is not for me, I'll not > complain. As you may or may not have been previously advised, http://packages.debian.org/squeeze-backports/ -- Bob Holtzman If you think you're getting free lunch, check the price of the beer. Key ID: 8D549279 |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 02:25 AM. |
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.