On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 03:45:22PM -0400, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> On Sunday 06 April 2008, Brad Rogers wrote:
> > unfulfilling. Patrick McGoohan always maintains there's more to it
> > than that. He refuses, however, to be drawn on the subject. Which,
> > in itself is just as weird. :-)
> No, it's not. As Joe Straczynski, the creator of Babylon 5 has often
> said, to suggest is to create, to define is to destroy.
> Many people who create something they've worked hard on do not want to
> talk about the creative process or to tell people what was intended.
> To do so limits the interpretations and leads people to think that
Especially if its the media asking.
> If someone jumped out of a time portal today and said, "I've been
> hopping around in time and know why La Giaconda is smiling," it would
> limit the interest in the painting.
It certainly would for there shalt be far more important questions to
ask him, under torture if necessary, and some serious analysis of that
dar "time portal".
If you are not subscribed, ask to be CC'd as the Policy of this list is
to reply to the list only.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org
04-10-2008, 02:06 PM
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 09:14:00 +1200
Chris Bannister <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 03:51:07PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> > The Prisoner - Patrick McGoohan.
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)rad never immediately apparent"
I'll be the paint on the side if you'll be the tin
Love Song - The Damned
01-19-2009, 03:18 PM
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:40:30 -0500 Jonathan <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>Ok, the patches got sent to me but weren't posted to the list because the
>email was rejected. I'm forwarding this now so that the patches can be
>available to those on the list.
I'm planning on doing the 4.1 update and rolling the KDE piece in to the
4.1.4 sru we aleady have pending. I'm wating to see the new kdebluetooth
in Jaunty and then I'll update the intrepid one based on that.
kubuntu-devel mailing list
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
03-21-2011, 07:40 AM
While this fix is only related to Xen, the story may be interesting/good to know
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [stable] [email@example.com: [tip:x86/asm] x86, binutils, xen: Fix
another wrong size directive]
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 18:57:37 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: stable kernel team <email@example.com>
Please apply the commit below to -stable: new binutils broke the kernel build
back to and including v2.6.27.
----- Forwarded message from tip-bot for Alexander van Heukelum
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 08:04:00 GMT
From: tip-bot for Alexander van Heukelum <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com,
firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org,
email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com,
Subject: [tip:x86/asm] x86, binutils, xen: Fix another wrong size directive
Author: Alexander van Heukelum <firstname.lastname@example.org>
AuthorDate: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 21:59:38 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar <email@example.com>
CommitDate: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 09:02:29 +0100
x86, binutils, xen: Fix another wrong size directive
The latest binutils (18.104.22.16810302/Ubuntu) breaks the build
yet another time, under CONFIG_XEN=y due to a .size directive that
refers to a slightly differently named (hence, to the now very
strict and unforgiving assembler, non-existent) symbol.
This unnecessary build breakage caused by new binutils
version 2.21 gets escallated back several kernel releases spanning
several years of Linux history, affecting over 130,000 upstream
kernel commits (!), on CONFIG_XEN=y 64-bit kernels (i.e. essentially
affecting all major Linux distro kernel configs).
Git annotate tells us that this slight debug symbol code mismatch
bug has been introduced in 2008 in commit 3d75e1b8: