FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Debian > Debian User

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 03-21-2012, 06:56 PM
alberto fuentes
 
Default irq 19: nobody cared - Disabling IRQ #19

I get this at my testing box. Can anybody help me debug/fix this?


Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555028] irq 19: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555035] Pid: 0, comm: swapper/0 Tainted: P********** O 3.2.0-1-amd64 #1


Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555038] Call Trace:
Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555040]* <IRQ>* [<ffffffff81092062>] ? __report_bad_irq+0x2c/0xb5
Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555051]* [<ffffffff810922ea>] ? note_interrupt+0x174/0x1f6


Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555055]* [<ffffffff8109069f>] ? handle_irq_event_percpu+0x162/0x180
Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555060]* [<ffffffff810135b2>] ? read_tsc+0x5/0x14
Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555063]* [<ffffffff810906f1>] ? handle_irq_event+0x34/0x53


Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555069]* [<ffffffff8106b8e1>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x11/0x17
Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555072]* [<ffffffff81092a29>] ? handle_fasteoi_irq+0x7c/0x9e
Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555077]* [<ffffffff8100f835>] ? handle_irq+0x1d/0x21


Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555081]* [<ffffffff8100f565>] ? do_IRQ+0x42/0x98
Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555085]* [<ffffffff81340aee>] ? common_interrupt+0x6e/0x6e
Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555087]* <EOI>* [<ffffffff811ad378>] ? timerqueue_add+0x80/0xa0


Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555096]* [<ffffffff811e39c9>] ? intel_idle+0xea/0x119
Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555100]* [<ffffffff811e39a8>] ? intel_idle+0xc9/0x119
Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555105]* [<ffffffff812637cb>] ? cpuidle_idle_call+0xec/0x179


Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555109]* [<ffffffff8100d255>] ? cpu_idle+0xa5/0xf2
Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555114]* [<ffffffff816a9b3d>] ? start_kernel+0x3bd/0x3c8
Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555118]* [<ffffffff816a9140>] ? early_idt_handlers+0x140/0x140


Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555121]* [<ffffffff816a93c4>] ? x86_64_start_kernel+0x104/0x111
Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555124] handlers:
Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555144] [<ffffffffa0086be1>] ata_bmdma_interrupt


Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555151] [<ffffffffa01296c8>] irq_handler
Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555153] Disabling IRQ #19

thanks!
 
Old 03-21-2012, 07:29 PM
Mark Copper
 
Default irq 19: nobody cared - Disabling IRQ #19

I was plagued by this problem. I seemed to have fixed it by turning
of the firewire in Bios.

Best advice I saw in searching the net was to find out exactly what
device is causing the problem. Do that by finding out what devices
use the IRQ an turn them all off but one. Not so simple if a device
is your hard drive, but you get the idea.

Mark

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:56 PM, alberto fuentes <pajaro@gmail.com> wrote:
> I get this at my testing box. Can anybody help me debug/fix this?
>
>
> Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555028] irq 19: nobody cared (try booting
> with the "irqpoll" option)
> Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555035] Pid: 0, comm: swapper/0 Tainted:
> P********** O 3.2.0-1-amd64 #1
> Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555038] Call Trace:
> Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555040]* <IRQ>* [<ffffffff81092062>] ?
> __report_bad_irq+0x2c/0xb5
> Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555051]* [<ffffffff810922ea>] ?
> note_interrupt+0x174/0x1f6
> Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555055]* [<ffffffff8109069f>] ?
> handle_irq_event_percpu+0x162/0x180
> Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555060]* [<ffffffff810135b2>] ?
> read_tsc+0x5/0x14
> Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555063]* [<ffffffff810906f1>] ?
> handle_irq_event+0x34/0x53
> Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555069]* [<ffffffff8106b8e1>] ?
> arch_local_irq_save+0x11/0x17
> Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555072]* [<ffffffff81092a29>] ?
> handle_fasteoi_irq+0x7c/0x9e
> Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555077]* [<ffffffff8100f835>] ?
> handle_irq+0x1d/0x21
> Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555081]* [<ffffffff8100f565>] ?
> do_IRQ+0x42/0x98
> Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555085]* [<ffffffff81340aee>] ?
> common_interrupt+0x6e/0x6e
> Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555087]* <EOI>* [<ffffffff811ad378>] ?
> timerqueue_add+0x80/0xa0
> Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555096]* [<ffffffff811e39c9>] ?
> intel_idle+0xea/0x119
> Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555100]* [<ffffffff811e39a8>] ?
> intel_idle+0xc9/0x119
> Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555105]* [<ffffffff812637cb>] ?
> cpuidle_idle_call+0xec/0x179
> Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555109]* [<ffffffff8100d255>] ?
> cpu_idle+0xa5/0xf2
> Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555114]* [<ffffffff816a9b3d>] ?
> start_kernel+0x3bd/0x3c8
> Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555118]* [<ffffffff816a9140>] ?
> early_idt_handlers+0x140/0x140
> Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555121]* [<ffffffff816a93c4>] ?
> x86_64_start_kernel+0x104/0x111
> Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555124] handlers:
> Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555144] [<ffffffffa0086be1>]
> ata_bmdma_interrupt
> Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555151] [<ffffffffa01296c8>] irq_handler
> Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555153] Disabling IRQ #19
>
> thanks!


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: CAM-_JtnCNMsM_XJ=WEYAZWJpz=SeR8ruwRcvu4vVDg0sZRrZXQ@ma il.gmail.com">http://lists.debian.org/CAM-_JtnCNMsM_XJ=WEYAZWJpz=SeR8ruwRcvu4vVDg0sZRrZXQ@ma il.gmail.com
 
Old 03-22-2012, 04:24 PM
Camaleón
 
Default irq 19: nobody cared - Disabling IRQ #19

On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 20:56:52 +0100, alberto fuentes wrote:

(please, no html... thank you)

> I get this at my testing box. Can anybody help me debug/fix this?
>
>
> Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555028] irq 19: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

(...)

I wonder if you already have tried what the message suggests :-?

> Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555035] Pid: 0, comm: swapper/0 Tainted: P O 3.2.0-1-amd64 #1
> Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555038] Call Trace:
> Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555040] <IRQ> [<ffffffff81092062>] ? __report_bad_irq+0x2c/0xb5

(...)

In addition, consider in opening a bug report if the above does not make
any difference.

Greetings,

--
Camaleón


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: jkfn7j$qin$11@dough.gmane.org">http://lists.debian.org/jkfn7j$qin$11@dough.gmane.org
 
Old 03-22-2012, 06:14 PM
Mark Copper
 
Default irq 19: nobody cared - Disabling IRQ #19

On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Camaleón <noelamac@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 20:56:52 +0100, alberto fuentes wrote:
>
> (please, no html... thank you)
>
>> I get this at my testing box. Can anybody help me debug/fix this?
>>
>>
>> Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555028] irq 19: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> (...)
>
> I wonder if you already have tried what the message suggests :-?
>

I don't know about the original poster, but booting with irqpoll did
not solve the problem for me. (I may have included this in my post to
this list around March of last year).

>> Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555035] Pid: 0, comm: swapper/0 Tainted: P * * * * * O 3.2.0-1-amd64 #1
>> Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555038] Call Trace:
>> Mar 21 20:29:05 box kernel: [ 4787.555040] *<IRQ> *[<ffffffff81092062>] ? __report_bad_irq+0x2c/0xb5
>
> (...)
>
> In addition, consider in opening a bug report if the above does not make
> any difference.

I found numerous bug reports stemming from this type of problem around
the net, none resolved. So I think the problems are generally
idiosyncratic and between device and kernel. And, sorry to repeat,
the best help seems to come from kernel people if you can get their
attention. One's chances of that are better if one provides info
regarding one's hardware and a listing of the devices using the IRQ.

Hoping my travails may be of some benefit,

mark

>
> Greetings,
>
> --
> Camaleón
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jkfn7j$qin$11@dough.gmane.org
>


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAM-_JtkGd8SLtcz9M55VDcAdúuf4J7Dgfscms2OmjpH5EsGg@mail .gmail.com
 
Old 03-23-2012, 02:46 PM
Camaleón
 
Default irq 19: nobody cared - Disabling IRQ #19

On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:14:53 -0500, Mark Copper wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Camaleón <noelamac@gmail.com> wrote:

(...)

>> I wonder if you already have tried what the message suggests :-?
>>
>>
> I don't know about the original poster, but booting with irqpoll did not
> solve the problem for me. (I may have included this in my post to this
> list around March of last year).

Trying won't hurt.

>> In addition, consider in opening a bug report if the above does not
>> make any difference.
>
> I found numerous bug reports stemming from this type of problem around
> the net, none resolved. So I think the problems are generally
> idiosyncratic and between device and kernel. And, sorry to repeat, the
> best help seems to come from kernel people if you can get their
> attention. One's chances of that are better if one provides info
> regarding one's hardware and a listing of the devices using the IRQ.
>
> Hoping my travails may be of some benefit,

Yup, I would send a bug report against the kernel package (linux-image-*)
because of the trace. And true is that devels in that "department" are
fast as hell...

Greetings,

--
Camaleón


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: jki5s9$ld4$6@dough.gmane.org">http://lists.debian.org/jki5s9$ld4$6@dough.gmane.org
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 09:45 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright ©2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org