Anaconda selects these if we're on an appropriate system, so don't pull
them in by default.
---
comps-f16.xml.in | 2 --
comps-f17.xml.in | 2 --
2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/comps-f16.xml.in b/comps-f16.xml.in
index be87539..819a907 100644
--- a/comps-f16.xml.in
+++ b/comps-f16.xml.in
@@ -756,8 +756,6 @@
<packagereq type="mandatory">util-linux</packagereq>
<packagereq type="mandatory">vim-minimal</packagereq>
<packagereq type="mandatory">yum</packagereq>
- <packagereq type="default">efibootmgr</packagereq>
- <packagereq type="default">grub2</packagereq>
<packagereq type="default">ppc64-utils</packagereq>
<packagereq type="default">s390utils</packagereq>
<packagereq type="default">sendmail</packagereq>
diff --git a/comps-f17.xml.in b/comps-f17.xml.in
index 267fafa..fe3fa63 100644
--- a/comps-f17.xml.in
+++ b/comps-f17.xml.in
@@ -691,8 +691,6 @@
<packagereq type="mandatory">util-linux</packagereq>
<packagereq type="mandatory">vim-minimal</packagereq>
<packagereq type="mandatory">yum</packagereq>
- <packagereq type="default">efibootmgr</packagereq>
- <packagereq type="default">grub2</packagereq>
<packagereq type="default">ppc64-utils</packagereq>
<packagereq type="default">s390utils</packagereq>
<packagereq type="default">sendmail</packagereq>
--
1.7.6

_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

Peter Jones (pjones@redhat.com) said:
> Anaconda selects these if we're on an appropriate system, so don't pull
> them in by default.

Are they required somewhere appropriately that they'll get pulled into a
compose if they fall out of comps?

Bill


> ---
> comps-f16.xml.in | 2 --
> comps-f17.xml.in | 2 --
> 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/comps-f16.xml.in b/comps-f16.xml.in
> index be87539..819a907 100644
> --- a/comps-f16.xml.in
> +++ b/comps-f16.xml.in
> @@ -756,8 +756,6 @@
> <packagereq type="mandatory">util-linux</packagereq>
> <packagereq type="mandatory">vim-minimal</packagereq>
> <packagereq type="mandatory">yum</packagereq>
> - <packagereq type="default">efibootmgr</packagereq>
> - <packagereq type="default">grub2</packagereq>
> <packagereq type="default">ppc64-utils</packagereq>
> <packagereq type="default">s390utils</packagereq>
> <packagereq type="default">sendmail</packagereq>
> diff --git a/comps-f17.xml.in b/comps-f17.xml.in
> index 267fafa..fe3fa63 100644
> --- a/comps-f17.xml.in
> +++ b/comps-f17.xml.in
> @@ -691,8 +691,6 @@
> <packagereq type="mandatory">util-linux</packagereq>
> <packagereq type="mandatory">vim-minimal</packagereq>
> <packagereq type="mandatory">yum</packagereq>
> - <packagereq type="default">efibootmgr</packagereq>
> - <packagereq type="default">grub2</packagereq>
> <packagereq type="default">ppc64-utils</packagereq>
> <packagereq type="default">s390utils</packagereq>
> <packagereq type="default">sendmail</packagereq>
> --
> 1.7.6
>

_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

Bill Nottingham (notting@redhat.com) said:
> Peter Jones (pjones@redhat.com) said:
> > Anaconda selects these if we're on an appropriate system, so don't pull
> > them in by default.
>
> Are they required somewhere appropriately that they'll get pulled into a
> compose if they fall out of comps?

... appears not. So, we'd need some other way to ensure they get on the DVD.
We could add them to the kickstart file as an exception, although that may
not translate well to all downstream distributions. We could move all the
bootloaders to a group that kickstarts and downstreams need, but isn't
exposted to the user.

Bill

_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

On 09/29/2011 02:03 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:

Peter Jones (pjones@redhat.com) said:

Anaconda selects these if we're on an appropriate system, so don't pull
them in by default.


Are they required somewhere appropriately that they'll get pulled into a
compose if they fall out of comps?


Hrm. Probably not. Should I leave them in but put the type as something
other than default, instead of this?



Bill



---
comps-f16.xml.in | 2 --
comps-f17.xml.in | 2 --
2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/comps-f16.xml.in b/comps-f16.xml.in
index be87539..819a907 100644
--- a/comps-f16.xml.in
+++ b/comps-f16.xml.in
@@ -756,8 +756,6 @@
<packagereq type="mandatory">util-linux</packagereq>
<packagereq type="mandatory">vim-minimal</packagereq>
<packagereq type="mandatory">yum</packagereq>
-<packagereq type="default">efibootmgr</packagereq>
-<packagereq type="default">grub2</packagereq>
<packagereq type="default">ppc64-utils</packagereq>
<packagereq type="default">s390utils</packagereq>
<packagereq type="default">sendmail</packagereq>
diff --git a/comps-f17.xml.in b/comps-f17.xml.in
index 267fafa..fe3fa63 100644
--- a/comps-f17.xml.in
+++ b/comps-f17.xml.in
@@ -691,8 +691,6 @@
<packagereq type="mandatory">util-linux</packagereq>
<packagereq type="mandatory">vim-minimal</packagereq>
<packagereq type="mandatory">yum</packagereq>
-<packagereq type="default">efibootmgr</packagereq>
-<packagereq type="default">grub2</packagereq>
<packagereq type="default">ppc64-utils</packagereq>
<packagereq type="default">s390utils</packagereq>
<packagereq type="default">sendmail</packagereq>
--
1.7.6




--
Peter

What we need is either less corruption, or more chances to
participate in it.

01234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789 012345678901234567890123456789

_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

Anaconda selects these if we're on an appropriate system, so don't pull
them in by default.
---
comps-f16.xml.in | 5 +++--
comps-f17.xml.in | 5 +++--
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/comps-f16.xml.in b/comps-f16.xml.in
index be87539..a29daae 100644
--- a/comps-f16.xml.in
+++ b/comps-f16.xml.in
@@ -756,14 +756,15 @@
<packagereq type="mandatory">util-linux</packagereq>
<packagereq type="mandatory">vim-minimal</packagereq>
<packagereq type="mandatory">yum</packagereq>
- <packagereq type="default">efibootmgr</packagereq>
- <packagereq type="default">grub2</packagereq>
<packagereq type="default">ppc64-utils</packagereq>
<packagereq type="default">s390utils</packagereq>
<packagereq type="default">sendmail</packagereq>
<packagereq type="default">silo</packagereq>
<packagereq type="default">systemd</packagereq>
<packagereq type="default">yaboot</packagereq>
+ <packagereq type="optional">efibootmgr</packagereq>
+ <packagereq type="optional">grub2</packagereq>
+ <packagereq type="optional">grub</packagereq>
</packagelist>
</group>
<!--
diff --git a/comps-f17.xml.in b/comps-f17.xml.in
index 267fafa..eb5b815 100644
--- a/comps-f17.xml.in
+++ b/comps-f17.xml.in
@@ -691,14 +691,15 @@
<packagereq type="mandatory">util-linux</packagereq>
<packagereq type="mandatory">vim-minimal</packagereq>
<packagereq type="mandatory">yum</packagereq>
- <packagereq type="default">efibootmgr</packagereq>
- <packagereq type="default">grub2</packagereq>
<packagereq type="default">ppc64-utils</packagereq>
<packagereq type="default">s390utils</packagereq>
<packagereq type="default">sendmail</packagereq>
<packagereq type="default">silo</packagereq>
<packagereq type="default">systemd</packagereq>
<packagereq type="default">yaboot</packagereq>
+ <packagereq type="optional">efibootmgr</packagereq>
+ <packagereq type="optional">grub2</packagereq>
+ <packagereq type="optional">grub</packagereq>
</packagelist>
</group>
<!--
--
1.7.6

_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

Peter Jones (pjones@redhat.com) said:
> On 09/29/2011 02:03 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> >Peter Jones (pjones@redhat.com) said:
> >>Anaconda selects these if we're on an appropriate system, so don't pull
> >>them in by default.
> >
> >Are they required somewhere appropriately that they'll get pulled into a
> >compose if they fall out of comps?
>
> Hrm. Probably not. Should I leave them in but put the type as something
> other than default, instead of this?

Optional packages aren't pulled into the compose.

Bill

_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list