On Monday 06 June 2011 20:14:34 Lisi wrote:
> The fact that you are unfamiliar with apt-get update

should, of course, be apt-get full-upgrade. Sorry :-( I'm a lousy typist and
teh keyboard seems to affect my brain.

Lisi

> is not strictly
> relevant here, though if someone who is familiar with it wishes to correct
> me, I shall be happy to listen. *I use aptitude not apt and there are some
> differences. This may be one such.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 201106062022.58862.lisi.reisz@gmail.com">http://lists.debian.org/201106062022.58862.lisi.reisz@gmail.com

On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Lisi <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday 06 June 2011 20:14:34 Lisi wrote:
>>
>> The fact that you are unfamiliar with apt-get update
>
> should, of course, be apt-get full-upgrade.

You mean "apt-get dist-upgrade" ("aptitude full-upgrade" is the
aptitude equivalent).


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: BANLkTik3sU2B7=1Hs1D+oERaVZ0H=NEOmw@mail.gmail.com ">http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTik3sU2B7=1Hs1D+oERaVZ0H=NEOmw@mail.gmail.com

On Monday 06 June 2011 21:25:52 Tom H wrote:
> You mean "apt-get dist-upgrade" ("aptitude full-upgrade" is the
> aptitude equivalent).

Thanks - I am much more familiar with aptitude. Because aptitude
has "switched" (by recommendation, not by formal instructions) from aptitude
dist-upgrade to aptitude full-upgrade I assumed - falsely it transpires -
that apt-get had done the same. :-(

Lisi


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 201106062133.36498.lisi.reisz@gmail.com">http://lists.debian.org/201106062133.36498.lisi.reisz@gmail.com