[Please reply to the list and not to me personally.]
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 06:00:08 -0500
Paul Cartwright <debian@pcartwright.com> wrote:
> On 11/09/2010 09:06 PM, Celejar wrote:
> >>> Don't know - works here. Does the Gmail importer work for you?
> >>> > >
> >> > yes!
> > This doesn't add up - how can Gmail work if POP isn't functional? What
> > tool are you trying to POP with? What port, etc.?
> that's a good question.. all I know is I have a gmail folder that has
> all my yahoo.com emails in it..
> I just forgot to add a gmail account into thunderbird
You misunderstand - I'm asking you how *you've* tried to POP directly
from Yahoo - with what tool, settings, etc.?
> gmail uses a 3rd party app called trueswitcher to make the transfer of
> email, contacts, etc from yahoo, it isn't pop3..
>
> http://mail.google.com/support/bin/static.py?page=guide.cs&guide=25413&topic=25415&an swer=166833
> <http://mail.google.com/support/bin/static.py?page=guide.cs&guide=25413&topic=25415&an swer=166833>
>
> *Note:* If you don't see a dialog box like the one below, it's because
> we can't use TrueSwitch to handle your import. Instead, we will try to
> use Mail Fetcher, a Gmail-internal feature. You can find detailed
> information about Mail Fetcher
> <https://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=21288>.
Hm, when I navigate Google, I never get to that TrueSwitch stuff:
http://mail.google.com/support/
http://mail.google.com/support/bin/topic.py?hl=en&topic=28647
http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=56283
I don't know how you ended up there - I see that your urls have a
different structure, with 'static' in them. No idea, and I don't have
the patience to figure out Gmail's internals.
Celejar
--
foffl.sourceforge.net - Feeds OFFLine, an offline RSS/Atom aggregator
mailmin.sourceforge.net - remote access via secure (OpenPGP) email
ssuds.sourceforge.net - A Simple Sudoku Solver and Generator
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 20101110085730.2eeba067.celejar@gmail.com">http://lists.debian.org/20101110085730.2eeba067.celejar@gmail.com
Wed Nov 10 15:30:02 2010
Return-path: <advisory-board-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org>
Envelope-to: tom@linux-archive.org
Delivery-date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:01:26 +0200
Received: from bastion02.fedoraproject.org ([209.132.181.3]:42390 helo=bastion.fedoraproject.org)
by s2.java-tips.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <advisory-board-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org>)
id 1PGAIm-0000Jq-Lv
for tom@linux-archive.org; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:01:24 +0200
Received: from lists.fedoraproject.org (collab1.vpn.fedoraproject.org [192.168.1.21])
by bastion02.phx2.fedoraproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4A3411153F;
Wed, 10 Nov 2010 13:59:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from collab1.fedoraproject.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by lists.fedoraproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 846AD326795;
Wed, 10 Nov 2010 13:59:13 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: advisory-board@lists.fedoraproject.org
Delivered-To: advisory-board@lists.fedoraproject.org
Received: from smtp-mm3.fedoraproject.org (smtp-mm3.fedoraproject.org
[152.46.7.226])
by lists.fedoraproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEF38326718
for <advisory-board@lists.fedoraproject.org>;
Wed, 10 Nov 2010 13:59:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ey0-f173.google.com (mail-ey0-f173.google.com
[209.85.215.173])
by smtp-mm3.fedoraproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7852437D46
for <advisory-board@lists.fedoraproject.org>;
Wed, 10 Nov 2010 13:59:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by eya25 with SMTP id 25so257235eya.32
for <advisory-board@lists.fedoraproject.org>;
Wed, 10 Nov 2010 05:59:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.14.47.78 with SMTP id s54mr5991377eeb.2.1289397550805;
Wed, 10 Nov 2010 05:59:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from valhalla.rhi.hi.is (valhalla.rhi.hi.is [130.208.69.191])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v51sm719571eeh.10.2010.11.10.05.59.09
(version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 10 Nov 2010 05:59:10 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4CDAA52D.1020507@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 13:59:09 +0000
From: =?UTF-8?B?IkrDs2hhbm4gQi4gR3XDsG11bmRzc29uIg==?=
<johannbg@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Fedora/3.1.6-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: advisory-board@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: Corporate sponsorship ( was Re: Going passive )
References: <30708656.12171289345970210.JavaMail.root@zimbra.c bccgroup.com> <4CD9F9C2.4050002@gmail.com> <AANLkTinRLH6g2sV-dF2=SyUjYoDs_+JPEh0FjpZfLFEq@mail.gmail.com> <4CDA94C0.4000904@gmail.com>
<AANLkTikwtDdXAtHpnq=dZrb4=++FaTAT74T+tFf6BwJq@mai l.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikwtDdXAtHpnq=dZrb4=++FaTAT74T+tFf6BwJq@mai l.gmail.com>
X-BeenThere: advisory-board@lists.fedoraproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Fedora community advisory board
<advisory-board@lists.fedoraproject.org>
List-Id: Fedora community advisory board
<advisory-board.lists.fedoraproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board>,
<mailto:advisory-board-request@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=unsubscrib e>
List-Archive: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board>
List-Post: <mailto:advisory-board@lists.fedoraproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:advisory-board-request@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board>,
<mailto:advisory-board-request@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: advisory-board-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org
Errors-To: advisory-board-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 11/10/2010 01:07 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
> I've never seen anyone, in any office or role, actively set out to
> destroy the Community, or other individuals' involvement, or ramrod
> some unspecified corporate agenda down the throats of contributors.
Well it's a question of certain attitude towards other *DE within our
community does not fall under that category.
You can look at it in various way but it seems to be systematic pattern
in setting stone in their path throughout Fedora history.
They don't get equal presentation on our web page, often decision are
made without their involvement which directly affect them and their
work and so on and so fourth.
This kind of behaviour directly or indirectly hinders the growth in the
micro community surrounding them hence they will never be able to stand
a chance gain more contributors and live up to their own full potentials.
Personally I've never seen the reason why we have to push and promote a
single *DE given the diversity of our community ( or target a single set
of user base for that matter ) as I see it people want to run the same
OS and the same set of application on their workstation,laptop,Tablet pc
and their phone and have for several years now.
Needles to say Google and Apple realized this and as things are now that
fight is between IOS and Android and none of the *DE we ship ( and even
other OS out there ) are even close to compete against them heck they
have to play like 2 years of catching up and bring some fresh user
experience to table if they are going to succeed so I honestly do not
see the point why this attitude carries on.
As far as I see eventually the one OS and the DE on top of it which
combines the best experience combined between all those devices is the
one that will stand victorious and claim the market out there.
Just my 2. cents on the whole *DE mess..
JBG
_______________________________________________
advisory-board mailing list
advisory-board@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
postfix & dovecot- IMAP/Maildir format not working-GMAIL import of Yahoo
