Op 12-10-10 18:05, Camaleón schreef:
> On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 07:57:40 -0300, Eike Lantzsch wrote:
>> On Tuesday 12 October 2010 05:00:36 PETER EASTHOPE wrote:
>>> Somewhere I've read that a camera must be UVC conformant to qualify to
>>> use the Vista label on the package. It wasn't an authoritative source.
>>> Recently I put an inexpensive camera on Squeeze and got a local image
>>> in Skype. Oddly the remote image was OK without the camera but garbled
>>> with the camera connected.
>>> Can anyone explain this observation or cite pertinent documentation?
>>> Thanks, ... Peter E.
>> Not enough info to help, really, but what about your bandwidth?
> Yep, it's a bit vague description. I would also test the webcam with
> another program like Kopete or Ekiga, to discard any issue with Skype.
Better, try luvcview or guvcview, specialised programmes to just grab
the output of the camera. They also allow to alter the settings, maybe
you can fix things.