Squeeze. What is current hibernation mechanism ==> pm-utils
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 01:32:44 +0000, T o n g wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 16:11:26 +0000, Camaleón wrote:
>> I would recommend reading [ . . . ]
> So, the Debian-recommended way is (still) "pm-utils". I saw that
> pm-utils depends on HAL, and thinking that the HAL will soon be the
> thing in the past, so I went for the other route: hibernate with kernel
> patch, then hibernate with uwusup. They all turned out to be dead ends.
Mmm... you shouldn't care about the backend used by "gnome-power-manager"
or "pm-utils", that's up to developers. User (like us) only have to check
if "it works", and if doesn't, make some debug, testing and review the
logs to find out the culprit.
Nowadays "gnome-power-manager" seems to use DBus instad of HAL, though.
> What is not working for me? Anything & everything:
> - suspend
> - hibernation
What happens when you trigger "suspend" or "hibernation"?
> - lid close
> - power button to turn off computer
These are ACPI events. You mean you get no response when you run any of
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com