If chdir() does not return 0, display an error of some sort and don't do
what we were about to do.
---
loader/init.c | 9 ++++++---
loader/loader.c | 13 ++++++++-----
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
07-27-2010, 05:57 AM
"Brian C. Lane"
Check return value of chdir()
On 07/26/2010 09:15 PM, David Cantrell wrote:
If chdir() does not return 0, display an error of some sort and don't do
what we were about to do.
---
Ack.
Do you have any idea why those suddenly started causing problems? I ran
into that today mysel. A mockbuild of 14.12 from cvs built fine. Doing a
mock (not in cvs) of master was failing with the 'warnings are now
errors' error on those return values.
--
Brian C. Lane <bcl@redhat.com>
Red Hat / Port Orchard, WA
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
07-27-2010, 06:58 AM
David Cantrell
Check return value of chdir()
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010, Brian C. Lane wrote:
On 07/26/2010 09:15 PM, David Cantrell wrote:
If chdir() does not return 0, display an error of some sort and don't do
what we were about to do.
---
Ack.
Do you have any idea why those suddenly started causing problems? I ran into
that today mysel. A mockbuild of 14.12 from cvs built fine. Doing a mock (not
in cvs) of master was failing with the 'warnings are now errors' error on
those return values.
No idea, but this happens from time to time when the toolchain changes.
--
David Cantrell <dcantrell@redhat.com>
Red Hat / Honolulu, HI
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
07-27-2010, 07:29 AM
David Cantrell
Check return value of chdir()
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010, David Cantrell wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010, Brian C. Lane wrote:
On 07/26/2010 09:15 PM, David Cantrell wrote:
If chdir() does not return 0, display an error of some sort and don't do
what we were about to do.
---
Ack.
Do you have any idea why those suddenly started causing problems? I ran
into that today mysel. A mockbuild of 14.12 from cvs built fine. Doing a
mock (not in cvs) of master was failing with the 'warnings are now errors'
error on those return values.
No idea, but this happens from time to time when the toolchain changes.
Scratch that, we have -Werror in our CFLAGS.
--
David Cantrell <dcantrell@redhat.com>
Red Hat / Honolulu, HI
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
Tue Jul 27 10:30:01 2010
Return-path: <bounce-debian-user=tom=linux-archive.org@lists.debian.org>
Envelope-to: tom@linux-archive.org
Delivery-date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:57:13 +0300
Received: from liszt.debian.org ([82.195.75.100]:56953)
by s2.java-tips.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <bounce-debian-user=tom=linux-archive.org@lists.debian.org>)
id 1Ode6C-0006dU-Se
for tom@linux-archive.org; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:57:13 +0300
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by liszt.debian.org (Postfix) with QMQP
id D32B82D0DA7; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 07:41:18 +0000 (UTC)
Old-Return-Path: <gpall@ccf.auth.gr>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on liszt.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.6 required=4.0 tests=LDOSUBSCRIBER,LDO_WHITELIST,
RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=failed version=3.2.5
X-Original-To: lists-debian-user@liszt.debian.org
Delivered-To: lists-debian-user@liszt.debian.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by liszt.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D02B313A5085
for <lists-debian-user@liszt.debian.org>; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 07:41:12 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.debian.org with policy bank en-ht
X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-8 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3
tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
autolearn=ham
Received: from liszt.debian.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (lists.debian.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 2525)
with ESMTP id BrdFMRgQqyq5 for <lists-debian-user@liszt.debian.org>;
Tue, 27 Jul 2010 07:41:04 +0000 (UTC)
X-policyd-weight: using cached result; rate: -7
Received: from hermes3.ccf.auth.gr (hermes3.ccf.auth.gr [155.207.1.69])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "AUTH Mail Servers", Issuer "AUTH Network Operations Center Certification Authority R3" (not verified))
by liszt.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8080413A492B
for <debian-user@lists.debian.org>; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 07:40:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [155.207.112.128] (aris.ccf2.auth.gr [155.207.112.128])
(authenticated bits=0)
by hermes3.ccf.auth.gr (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o6R7es0f029882
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
for <debian-user@lists.debian.org>; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:40:55 +0300
Message-ID: <4C4E8D85.9050703@ccf.auth.gr>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:40:53 +0300
From: =?UTF-8?B?zpPOuc+Oz4HOs86/z4IgzqDOrM67zrvOsc+C?=
<gpall@ccf.auth.gr>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100619 Icedove/3.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Depreciated warning I can't quite read
References: <4C4E8A36.5030703@chandlerfamily.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <4C4E8A36.5030703@chandlerfamily.org.uk>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms090604010901050700070200"
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96 at hermes1
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Rc-Virus: 2007-09-13_01
X-Rc-Spam: 2008-11-04_01
Resent-Message-ID: <ueq1n_UkO9N.A.zYH.e2oTMB@liszt>
Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
X-Mailing-List: <debian-user@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/582050
X-Loop: debian-user@lists.debian.org
List-Id: <debian-user.lists.debian.org>
List-Post: <mailto:debian-user@lists.debian.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debian-user-request@lists.debian.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:debian-user-request@lists.debian.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:debian-user-request@lists.debian.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 07:41:18 +0000 (UTC)
This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format.
Seeing someone else ask a question about where boot messages are
logged, reminds me of an issue I have been wondering about for a few
weeks
During bootup of my system, very early in the process, I am getting
some messages appear on the screen very briefly which mention
udevd
SYSFS
depreciated
Its a warning of some sort, but it flies past so fast that I can't
really read what it is saying.
This is my desktop system, which originally ran debian unstable - but
a couple of months ago I replaced unstable with squeeze in my
sources.list and have been allowing the system to migrate into that mod=
e.
I am not sure if this message is a legacy, or everyone is seeing
something similar.
Anyone any idea what these messages might be and how I can rectify the
whatever it is complaining about (just being able to see what the
message says might also help).
Maybe something like that?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D582639