Hi,

I'm using the plugin mentioned in the subject. It works correctly with
all Debian packaged kernels that I've tried, but when I use
2.6.24-rc4 (vanilla from kernel.org), it erroneously reports "AC
off-line" and "28%" (always!), even though the adapter is plugged in
and the battery is fully charged. 'acpi -t' gives the correct state,
and the values in '/proc/acpi/battery' and 'ac_adapter' seem correct.
Do I file a bug somewhere?

Celejar
--
mailmin.sourceforge.net - remote access via secure (OpenPGP) email
ssuds.sourceforge.net - A Simple Sudoku Solver and Generator


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 the mental interface of
Celejar told:

> Hi,
>
> I'm using the plugin mentioned in the subject. It works correctly with
> all Debian packaged kernels that I've tried, but when I use
> 2.6.24-rc4 (vanilla from kernel.org), it erroneously reports "AC
> off-line" and "28%" (always!), even though the adapter is plugged in
> and the battery is fully charged. 'acpi -t' gives the correct state,
> and the values in '/proc/acpi/battery' and 'ac_adapter' seem correct.
> Do I file a bug somewhere?

The ACPI code has changed in 2.6.24. Check your config.

Elimar

--
Do you smell something burning or ist it me?


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 19:34:20 +0100
Elimar Riesebieter <riesebie@lxtec.de> wrote:

> On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 the mental interface of
> Celejar told:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm using the plugin mentioned in the subject. It works correctly with
> > all Debian packaged kernels that I've tried, but when I use
> > 2.6.24-rc4 (vanilla from kernel.org), it erroneously reports "AC
> > off-line" and "28%" (always!), even though the adapter is plugged in
> > and the battery is fully charged. 'acpi -t' gives the correct state,
> > and the values in '/proc/acpi/battery' and 'ac_adapter' seem correct.
> > Do I file a bug somewhere?
>
> The ACPI code has changed in 2.6.24. Check your config.

Thanks; config of what?

> Elimar

Celejar
--
mailmin.sourceforge.net - remote access via secure (OpenPGP) email
ssuds.sourceforge.net - A Simple Sudoku Solver and Generator


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 06:56:30PM -0500, Celejar wrote:

> > The ACPI code has changed in 2.6.24. Check your config.
>
> Thanks; config of what?

I'm guessing the config of your custom kernel.

Regards,
Andrei
--
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
(Albert Einstein)

On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 09:52:19 +0200
Andrei Popescu <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 06:56:30PM -0500, Celejar wrote:
>
> > > The ACPI code has changed in 2.6.24. Check your config.
> >
> > Thanks; config of what?
>
> I'm guessing the config of your custom kernel.

The only relevant option I can find there is PM_LEGACY; turning it on
doesn't solve the problem. Note that the acpi command returns the
correct information, which is present in /proc.acpi, as mentioned in my
first mail.

> Regards,
> Andrei

Celejar
--
mailmin.sourceforge.net - remote access via secure (OpenPGP) email
ssuds.sourceforge.net - A Simple Sudoku Solver and Generator


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org