FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Debian > Debian User

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 10-16-2008, 05:33 AM
"Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso"
 
Default Removing swfdec-mozilla removes gnome?

2008/10/15 Carl Fink <carlf@panix.com>:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 06:45:20AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
>> You should then mark the packages you want to keep as "manually
>> installed" to tell apt/aptitude that you want them. E.g. use
>> "aptitude unmarkauto <package>" to mark individual packages or
>> "aptitude unmarkauto '~sgnome'" to mark all Gnome packages as manually
>> installed.
>
> I've been using Debian since what, slink? No, wait, hamm. I knew that. It
> doesn't make the default behavior less ridiculous.

I say that's a bug. File a bug against the Gnome package. swfdec
dependency should clearly be downgraded to Suggests: or Recommends: at
most.

- Jordi G. H.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
 
Old 10-16-2008, 07:52 AM
"Aioanei Rares"
 
Default Removing swfdec-mozilla removes gnome?

On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 5:28 AM, Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> wrote:


On 10/15/08 20:09, Kelly Clowers wrote:

On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Carl Fink <carlf@panix.com> wrote:


On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 10:17:42PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:


But maybe you are more interested in the question why gnome depends on
swfdec-mozilla in the first place. *I don't know that; probably because

the Debian Gnome maintainers consider a flash plugin necessary for good
desktop experience.
My point is that it's idiotic that removing swfdec (to install, say, gnash)
removes all the GNOME packages, not just the metapackage.


Are you sure it isn't trying to remove them because they were
autoinstalled, and now the package that depends on them (the
gnome metapakage) is gone?

apt-get would only remove the meta-package and leave the other packages.


It would, however, nag you about the auto-installed packages, telling you how to get rid of them. *If, however, you wanted to keep (some of) them, just "apt-get install" them, and apt-get will learn that you want to keep them.


--
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA *USA

Help a man when he is in trouble and he will remember you when
he is in trouble again.





--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org




*
I got the same problem few days ago and I had to reinstall my gnome...now when i do apt-get update && apt-get upgrade it always keeps back swfdec-mozilla.
 
Old 10-16-2008, 12:55 PM
Ron Johnson
 
Default Removing swfdec-mozilla removes gnome?

On 10/16/08 02:52, Aioanei Rares wrote:



On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 5:28 AM, Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net

[snip]



apt-get would only remove the meta-package and leave the other packages.

It would, however, nag you about the auto-installed packages,
telling you how to get rid of them. If, however, you wanted to keep
(some of) them, just "apt-get install" them, and apt-get will learn
that you want to keep them.


I got the same problem few days ago and I had to reinstall my
gnome...now when i do apt-get update && apt-get upgrade it always keeps
back swfdec-mozilla.


Totally understandable, since "apt-get update" is designed to only
update *existing* packages. Any needs-updating package that now
requires a new package gets held back.


# apt-get --simulate install swfdec-mozilla

--
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA

Help a man when he is in trouble and he will remember you when
he is in trouble again.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 05:58 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright ©2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org