How Linux becomes Windows
I won't start commenting on all this HAL, udev and similar bullshit.
But this error message when I used modconf: "update-modules deprecated" Is another sign that people here are trying to emulate even the bad sides of Windows. *I* (ME!) wan't to have fucking control over my modules back you frickin' desktop loving auto-this, auto-that assholes!!!! :C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
How Linux becomes Windows
Dirk wrote:
I won't start commenting on all this HAL, udev and similar bullshit. But this error message when I used modconf: "update-modules deprecated" Is another sign that people here are trying to emulate even the bad sides of Windows. *I* (ME!) wan't to have fucking control over my modules back you frickin' desktop loving auto-this, auto-that assholes!!!! :C Hmm, I am not sure what you are talking about. HAL and udev have been standard in all desktops for awhile now. If you truly hate hal maybe you can just not install any desktop and just do all your computing through the console. Mutt and lynx are pretty nice ;) Sam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
How Linux becomes Windows
Looks like someone is having a bad day.
Perhaps Slackware is what you're looking for. - Nate >> -- Wireless | Amateur Radio Station N0NB | Successfully Microsoft Amateur radio exams; ham radio; Linux info @ | free since January 1998. http://www.qsl.net/n0nb/ | "Debian, the choice of My Kawasaki KZ-650 SR @ | a GNU generation!" http://www.networksplus.net/n0nb/ | http://www.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
How Linux becomes Windows
Sam Leon writes:
> HAL and udev have been standard in all desktops for awhile now. I don't see how you can say that either is part of any desktop, though kdebase depends on HAL (gnome-core depends on neither). Your system will work fine without either (as will X). If he removes udev he will have to do some stuff by hand, but he seems to want that. > If you truly hate hal maybe you can just not install any desktop and just > do all your computing through the console. X is quite useable without any "desktop" and certainly does not require HAL. Are you confounding "desktop" and "window mamager"? -- John Hasler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
How Linux becomes Windows
Dirk <noisyb@gmail.com> writes:
> I won't start commenting on all this HAL, udev and similar bullshit. I agree about HAL, and the thing really just makes me nervous. I was apparently right too, because when I turned it off via update-rc.d, my box started singing about somebody named Daisy. The one I really don't understand though is avahi. I kept seeing this in my ps output and really had no idea at all what it was. I tried to find out, but couldn't. Did the CIA write this thing? Finally I turned it off too, and nothing exploded so far. But, just what is all this stuff anyway? Personally, I thought avahi was some sort of fruity shampoo my wife uses. Patrick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
How Linux becomes Windows
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 cothrige wrote: > Dirk <noisyb@gmail.com> writes: > <...> > The one I really don't understand though is avahi. I kept seeing this > in my ps output and really had no idea at all what it was. I tried to > find out, but couldn't. Did the CIA write this thing? Finally I turned > it off too, and nothing exploded so far. But, just what is all this > stuff anyway? Personally, I thought avahi was some sort of fruity > shampoo my wife uses. Forget the shampoo. Avahi is "how Linux becomes OS X". ;| Å*arÅ«nas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHXZkqejaFVltl6E8RAq1pAKCTAvnhZcAqUp8dkbtQww g47Y4PnQCfSvKw Tfo6BuDGq1hhPgRx6VG0i/U= =l5kJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
How Linux becomes Windows
On Monday 10 December 2007, cothrige wrote:
> Dirk <noisyb@gmail.com> writes: > > I won't start commenting on all this HAL, udev and similar > > bullshit. > > I agree about HAL, and the thing really just makes me nervous. I was > apparently right too, because when I turned it off via update-rc.d, > my box started singing about somebody named Daisy. Odd. Mine just said, "I'm afraid I can't do that, Dave." Personally, I just wish someone would have picked a different name. I forgot whether it was an Ubuntu or Debian (not Stable) box I had set up would not let me have a user named "hal" because of HAL. That gets frustrating since that's what I use as my username on most of my own systems. It's frustrating to not be able to use one's own name. And, to be honest, I don't like seeing people talking about how much they hate HAL. ;-) > The one I really don't understand though is avahi. I kept seeing > this in my ps output and really had no idea at all what it was. I > tried to find out, but couldn't. Did the CIA write this thing? > Finally I turned it off too, and nothing exploded so far. But, just > what is all this stuff anyway? Personally, I thought avahi was some > sort of fruity shampoo my wife uses. A quick Wikipedia search (found it on my first try) gave me this: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avahi_%28software%29> A Google search turned up 47,000 hits. "Apt-cache search avahi" returned 34 packages on my Ubuntu Fiesty workstation. (I didn't try it on my Debian servers, I figure the point has been made.) Hal (Who even has his name on his license, Virginia plates "HAL 9000".) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
How Linux becomes Windows
Hal Vaughan <hal@thresholddigital.com> writes:
> Odd. Mine just said, "I'm afraid I can't do that, Dave." Well, you probably let it see you coming. > A quick Wikipedia search (found it on my first try) gave me this: > > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avahi_%28software%29> Showoff ;-) Seriously though, I must admit it appears like it could be useful, though on my little standalone box it probably wouldn't do much for me. Patrick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
How Linux becomes Windows
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 05:27:30PM +0100, Dirk wrote:
> I won't start commenting on all this HAL, udev and similar bullshit. > > But this error message when I used modconf: "update-modules deprecated" > > Is another sign that people here are trying to emulate even the bad > sides of Windows. > > *I* (ME!) wan't to have fucking control over my modules back you > frickin' desktop loving auto-this, auto-that assholes!!!! Try OpenBSD. No modules to worry about, no auto-anything, dmesg shows you everything you have and where it is. Simple. Only downsides: if you need a module for some piece of closed-source hardware; package management is quite as simple as with aptitude; no volume-management like LVM or easy software-raid; no flash-enabled browser. I agree that linux has become a cliky-pointy-lindows thingy unless you fight it. I don't do CUPS, I don't do DTE. I use lpr, CLI, startx, icewm. To mount a USB stick I have an entry in fstab for /dev/sdc1. If udev were to act up, I'd use LABLE=stick1: this is the fight-it part. Doug. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
How Linux becomes Windows
On Thursday 13 December 2007, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 05:27:30PM +0100, Dirk wrote: > > I won't start commenting on all this HAL, udev and similar > > bullshit. > > > > But this error message when I used modconf: "update-modules > > deprecated" > > > > Is another sign that people here are trying to emulate even the bad > > sides of Windows. > > > > *I* (ME!) wan't to have fucking control over my modules back you > > frickin' desktop loving auto-this, auto-that assholes!!!! > > Try OpenBSD. No modules to worry about, no auto-anything, dmesg > shows you everything you have and where it is. Simple. Only > downsides: if you need a module for some piece of closed-source > hardware; package management is quite as simple as with aptitude; no > volume-management like LVM or easy software-raid; no flash-enabled > browser. > > I agree that linux has become a cliky-pointy-lindows thingy unless > you fight it. I don't do CUPS, I don't do DTE. I use lpr, CLI, > startx, icewm. To mount a USB stick I have an entry in fstab for > /dev/sdc1. If udev were to act up, I'd use LABLE=stick1: this is the > fight-it part. Personally, I find a lot of these things let me focus on doing the work I need to do as opposed to having to spend time thinking about how I'm going to do something or making sure I can do something. Different methods work for different people. It's cliche, but true. Some people think better with a visual interface. It's just a different learning or processing style. What I like about Linux is that I have the choice. When I'm programming, I use a simple editor and am constantly using the CLI. When I'm writing film scripts, I need as intuitive and visual an interface as possible. Both use different parts of the brain. Hal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 08:43 AM. |
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.