FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Debian > Debian User

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 07-30-2008, 05:17 PM
"Eric d'Alibut"
 
Default Debian upgrade breaks djb stuff

On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 1:10 AM, Michael Sierchio
<ducatista@camber-thrust.net> wrote:

> It's a bug in DJB's code. `man errno`

If it were a bug in your brain, your altered neurology would see
things differently, and, perhaps, correctly. Do you have a bug in your
brain?

HEY! Apropos of nothing at all, did everyone see where THAT GENIUS rms
said, and I quote, "I am not a supporter of Linux . . ."?
http://allium.zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/2008-July/012546.html

The fever swamp is heating up!

Have at it lads.

--
No no no, my fish's name is Eric, Eric the fish. He's an halibut. I am
not a looney! Why should I be tarred with the epithet looney merely
because I have a pet halibut?


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org


Wed Jul 30 20:30:02 2008
Return-path: <fedora-packaging-bounces@redhat.com>
Envelope-to: tom@linux-archive.org
Delivery-date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:20:58 +0300
Received: from hormel1.redhat.com ([209.132.177.33] helo=hormel.redhat.com)
by s2.java-tips.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <fedora-packaging-bounces@redhat.com>)
id 1KOFMA-0006P9-0j
for tom@linux-archive.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:20:58 +0300
Received: from listman.util.phx.redhat.com (listman.util.phx.redhat.com [10.8.4.110])
by hormel.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15235618BFD;
Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:20:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com
[172.16.52.254])
by listman.util.phx.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id
m6UHKvUn032675 for <fedora-packaging@listman.util.phx.redhat.com>;
Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:20:57 -0400
Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32])
by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m6UHKub5006344
for <fedora-packaging@redhat.com>; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:20:56 -0400
Received: from mx1.es6.egwn.net (mx32b01.es6.egwn.net [195.10.6.123])
by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6UHKPAp012504
for <fedora-packaging@redhat.com>; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:20:26 -0400
Received: from mx2.es6.egwn.net (server09.es6.egwn.net [195.10.6.27])
by mx1.es6.egwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 642012C30A
for <fedora-packaging@redhat.com>;
Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:20:23 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:20:20 +0200
From: Matthias Saou
<thias@spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and. spam.freshrpms.net>
To: fedora-packaging@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Fedora-packaging] Adding mod_ban to proftpd?
Message-ID: <20080730192020.79f2ac05@python3.es.egwn.lan>
In-Reply-To: <4890A162.2060504@redfish-solutions.com>
References: <4890A162.2060504@redfish-solutions.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-RedHat-Spam-Score: 0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 172.16.52.254
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 172.16.48.32
X-loop: fedora-packaging@redhat.com
X-BeenThere: fedora-packaging@redhat.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: junk
Reply-To: Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora
<fedora-packaging@redhat.com>
List-Id: Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora
<fedora-packaging.redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging>,
<mailto:fedora-packaging-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging>
List-Post: <mailto:fedora-packaging@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:fedora-packaging-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging>,
<mailto:fedora-packaging-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: fedora-packaging-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: fedora-packaging-bounces@redhat.com

Philip Prindeville wrote :

> Could mod_ban be added to the built packages under Fedora? I run an FTP
> server, and mod_ban is very handy for protecting against attacks.
>
> It doesn't need to be made part of the base package. It could be
> handled the same way proftpd-ldap or proftpd-postgres is...

If it's included in the proftpd sources, then sure, please file a
bugzilla entry to track the change.
If it's an external module, then I'd really prefer if it got merged
upstream.

Matthias

--
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Fedora release 9 (Sulphur) - Linux kernel 2.6.25.6-55.fc9.x86_64
Load : 0.31 0.25 0.25

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 02:59 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org