> On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 23:29:01 -0400 Carl Fink <email@example.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 11:59:22PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > > On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 20:43:25 +0200
> > > Michelle Konzack <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Am 2008-07-14 17:15:41, schrieb Sam Leon:
> > > >
> > > > Please can you trim you rpostings next time please?
> > > >
> > > > > Welcome to the club. I used to feel the same way when I first found
> > > > > debian (ubuntu showed it to me). I don't worry about it too much any
> > > > > more. I like how it will keep all the newbies away from us so I don't
> > > > > have to spend all my time running from several questions of "how do I
> > > > > navigate the cli" type stuff.
> > > > > I like testing. I have not had a problem with it. I don't think you
> > > >
> > > > Oh realy, then you do not realy use Testing...
> > > >
> > > > My Testing and my Sid went broken for over 6 Weeks because the perl 5.10
> > > > transition... I do not find it realy funny, not to be able to use 60%
> > > > of my system...
> > I also run Testing and had a total of, um, no broken systems since Etch was
> > released. Some annoyances, but not a broken system.
> You accidentally trimmed my post, to which I think you are agreeing.
> The stuff you quote ends with Michelle's words.
> > Carl Fink email@example.com
I run Sidux on my sandbox laptop. I haven't seen it break yet,
though it's early yet.
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
(*) http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html Linux Counter #80292
- - http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html Please, don't Cc: me.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org
07-24-2008, 02:32 AM
My first message... more of a mad mans rant...
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 13:32 -0400, Steve C. Lamb wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 05:24:08PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > Without us, odds are the i386-based machine you're sitting at wouldn't
> > exist.
> Employing the royal we? Somehow, Paul, I think that without you we'd do
> just fine.
You're entitled to your opinion, but that doesn't make you less wrong.