Bug#469338: closed by Daniel Baumann
El mar, 06-05-2008 a las 10:15 +0000, Debian Bug Tracking System
escribió: > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > which was filed against the unionfs-modules-2.6-amd64 package: > > #469338: unionfs-modules does not work with 2.6.24-1 > > It has been closed by Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org> (reply to daniel@debian.org). > > Their explanation is attached below along with your original report. > If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a > better one in a separate message then please contact Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org> (reply to daniel@debian.org) by > replying to this email. > > > mensaje de correo electrónico adjunto > > --------- Mensaje reenviado -------- > > De: Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org> > > Responder a: daniel@debian.org > > Para: 469338-done@bugs.debian.org > > Asunto: Re: unionfs-modules does not work with 2.6.24-1 > > Fecha: Tue, 06 May 2008 12:11:45 +0200 > > > > Version: 2.6.25-1 > > Where can I get version 2.6.25-1? I know you're aware of this problem ;-) and its solution, but this bug is killing me softly.. (need this module for ltsp setups in my schools) |
Bug#469338: closed by Daniel Baumann
José L. Redrejo Rodríguez wrote:
> Where can I get version 2.6.25-1? 2.6.25 got abi bumped to -2, module uploads will follow soon. > this bug is killing me softly.. > (need this module for ltsp setups in my schools) as also said last time, just use aufs then. aufs is the better unionfs anyway. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baumann@panthera-systems.net Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
Bug#469338: closed by Daniel Baumann
El mié, 14-05-2008 a las 14:45 +0200, Daniel Baumann escribió:
> José L. Redrejo Rodríguez wrote: > > Where can I get version 2.6.25-1? > > 2.6.25 got abi bumped to -2, module uploads will follow soon. > great > > this bug is killing me softly.. > > (need this module for ltsp setups in my schools) > > as also said last time, just use aufs then. aufs is the better unionfs > anyway. > yes, I've tested aufs and worked like a charm, I'll send a patch to the ltsp maintainer, but I'd prefer to use the debian packages until the patch is aproved/rejected. Thanks. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 06:13 AM. |
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.