On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 21:57 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Is there any reasons why you've enabled CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE?
> This is the recommended default (though not the actual default).
Just a wild guess, but the help text could have just not been updated
(as in many cases).
Anyway,.. I just wanted you to point on this
> Larger code results in more I-cache misses, so it can be slower after
> Let's see your benchmark results.
Well.. I guess making usable benchmarks there is really difficult,.. as
this likely also depends on the system usage, wouldn't it?