Bug#661998: closed by Ben Hutchings
> From: Ben Hutchings <email@example.com>
> Subject: Re: Bug#661998: version requirement too specific
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 14:13:09 +0000
> On Sat, 2012-03-03 at 13:04 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> So why is there such a close version requirement between perf and
>> linux-tools-x.y? Why isn't there a perf_3 binary or just an
>> alternative that works with 3.x kernels in general
> perf version x.y may generally depend on new kernel features in x.y.
How does that prevent the existance of a perf_3 binary that requires
only features present in all (most) 3.x kernels? Sure you wouldn't get
all the bleeding edge features but you would get most functionality.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com
|All times are GMT. The time now is 08:05 PM.|
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.