Bug#652955: Naming inconsistancy? can cause dkms/m-a problems
On Thursday 26 Kislev 5772 10:17:12 Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> tags 652955 + moreinfo
> quit
>
> Hi David,
>
> David Baron wrote:
> > If I have the same kernel version installed for both i686 and amd64, for
> > example. The debian nvidia kernel modules will dkms successfully on both
> > while the debian virtualbox kernel modules will dkms only for one of
> > them.
>
> Please supply details, including the error message.
>
I had removed the headers for the kernel
Reinstalling them (running the 32-bit kernel):
Good news! Module version 4.1.6_Debian for vboxdrv.ko
exactly matches what is already found in kernel 3.1.0-1-amd64.
DKMS will not replace this module.
You may override by specifying --force.
Good news! Module version 4.1.6_Debian for vboxnetadp.ko
exactly matches what is already found in kernel 3.1.0-1-amd64.
DKMS will not replace this module.
You may override by specifying --force.
Good news! Module version 4.1.6_Debian for vboxnetflt.ko
exactly matches what is already found in kernel 3.1.0-1-amd64.
DKMS will not replace this module.
You may override by specifying --force.
Error! Module version 4.1.6_Debian for vboxpci.ko
is not newer than what is already found in kernel 3.1.0-1-amd64
(4.1.6_Debian).
You may override by specifying --force.
Yesterday when I was in that kernel, it did not load these modules so they may
be built for the wrong architecture. Next time I boot up the 64 bit kernel, I
will try again.
(That pci module fails in all the kernels. I generally only need the vboxdrv
module.)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 201112221038.21095.d_baron@012.net.il">http://lists.debian.org/201112221038.21095.d_baron@012.net.il