Bug#642729: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: bad ssd performance with squeeze kernel 2.6.32
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686
Version: 2.6.32-35squeeze2jba
Severity: normal
After adding a ssd (OCZ Vertex Plus 60GB) to my squeeze system (debian kernel 2.6.32)
I was disappointed about its performance, as it was advertised with 185 MB/s.
/dev/sdb:
Timing buffered disk reads: 214 MB in 3.01 seconds = 71.04 MB/sec
However, when running recent knoppix (kernel 3.0.4) I got the expected performance:
/dev/sdb:
Timing buffered disk reads: 490 MB in 3.00 seconds = 163.07 MB/sec
After googling, I found that this has been reported before:
It seems that early versions of kernel 2.6.32 have a bug that results in bad performance of some
ssds (maybe all, at least the 'OCZ Vertex Plus 60GB' and the 'Super Talent Ultradrive GX MLC 64GB').
Reverting the patch as described in the discussion solved the problem for me. I now have the
desired performance.
Thus, I would suggest to revert the patch "block: improve queue_should_plug() by looking at
IO depths" in kernel 2.6.32 for squeeze in order to get full ssd performance. I think the bugfix
is important as an increasing number of users havs ssds and the bug more or less breaks ssd
performance in squeeze.
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 depends on:
ii coreutils 8.5-1 GNU core utilities
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.36.1 Debian configuration management sy
linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 recommends no packages.
Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 suggests:
pn fdutils <none> (no description available)
pn ksymoops <none> (no description available)
pn linux-doc-2.6.32-5-686 | linu <none> (no description available)
pn linux-image-2.6.32-5-686-dbg <none> (no description available)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 20110924193442.3605.25621.reportbug@localhost">htt p://lists.debian.org/20110924193442.3605.25621.reportbug@localhost
10-24-2011, 07:04 PM
"Juergen Bausa"
Bug#642729: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: bad ssd performance with squeeze kernel 2.6.32
Sorry, I dont want to bother. But there has been no comment in one month. Does this
mean that the kernel team is just too busy or does it mean that I posted in the wrong place?
Juergen
__________________________________________________ _________
SMS schreiben mit WEB.DE FreeMail - einfach, schnell und
kostenguenstig. Jetzt gleich testen! http://f.web.de/?mc=021192
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 736350009.2061655.1319483050545.JavaMail.fmail@mwm web010">http://lists.debian.org/736350009.2061655.1319483050545.JavaMail.fmail@mwm web010
10-24-2011, 08:09 PM
Ben Hutchings
Bug#642729: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: bad ssd performance with squeeze kernel 2.6.32
On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 21:04 +0200, Juergen Bausa wrote:
> Sorry, I dont want to bother. But there has been no comment in one month. Does this
> mean that the kernel team is just too busy or does it mean that I posted in the wrong place?
This is the right place, but we're busy.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Reality is just a crutch for people who can't handle science fiction.