--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 20110620051620.GA11767@inguza.net">http://lists.debian.org/20110620051620.GA11767@inguza.net
06-20-2011, 10:23 AM
maximilian attems
Possibility of getting openvz problem included in stable?
Hi ola,
my patience for openvz is currently gone from epsilon to zero.
see
http://git.openvz.org/?p=linux-2.6.32-openvz;a=summary
and in contrary
http://wiki.openvz.org/Download/kernel/rhel4/023stab054.1
They *don't* update their git tree.
come on 2.6.32.28 is very old stable compared to 2.6.32.41
So if you might get them to push their RH fixes and updated
stable trees to their git 2.6.32, the situation might be different.
cheers
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 20110620102301.GA14539@vostochny.stro.at">http://lists.debian.org/20110620102301.GA14539@vostochny.stro.at
06-20-2011, 11:46 AM
"Ola Lundqvist"
Possibility of getting openvz problem included in stable?
Hi Maks and Kir
Maks: See below.
Kir: Can you see if the openvz team can help out with what is described below.
Quoting "maximilian attems" <max@stro.at>:
Hi ola,
my patience for openvz is currently gone from epsilon to zero.
see
http://git.openvz.org/?p=linux-2.6.32-openvz;a=summary
and in contrary
http://wiki.openvz.org/Download/kernel/rhel4/023stab054.1
They *don't* update their git tree.
come on 2.6.32.28 is very old stable compared to 2.6.32.41
So if you might get them to push their RH fixes and updated
stable trees to their git 2.6.32, the situation might be different.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 20110620134659.98893lekglnbeq80@webmail.inguza.net ">http://lists.debian.org/20110620134659.98893lekglnbeq80@webmail.inguza.net
06-20-2011, 12:40 PM
maximilian attems
Possibility of getting openvz problem included in stable?
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:23:01AM +0000, maximilian attems wrote:
> Hi ola,
>
> my patience for openvz is currently gone from epsilon to zero.
>
> see
> http://git.openvz.org/?p=linux-2.6.32-openvz;a=summary
>
> and in contrary
> http://wiki.openvz.org/Download/kernel/rhel4/023stab054.1
wrong c&p, meant of course,
see how happily that tree is maintained regularly:
http://wiki.openvz.org/Download/kernel/rhel6/042stab017.1
> They *don't* update their git tree.
> come on 2.6.32.28 is very old stable compared to 2.6.32.41
>
> So if you might get them to push their RH fixes and updated
> stable trees to their git 2.6.32, the situation might be different.
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 20110620124057.GB14539@vostochny.stro.at">http://lists.debian.org/20110620124057.GB14539@vostochny.stro.at
06-20-2011, 12:40 PM
maximilian attems
Possibility of getting openvz problem included in stable?
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:23:01AM +0000, maximilian attems wrote:
> Hi ola,
>
> my patience for openvz is currently gone from epsilon to zero.
>
> see
> http://git.openvz.org/?p=linux-2.6.32-openvz;a=summary
>
> and in contrary
> http://wiki.openvz.org/Download/kernel/rhel4/023stab054.1
wrong c&p, meant of course,
see how happily that tree is maintained regularly:
http://wiki.openvz.org/Download/kernel/rhel6/042stab017.1
> They *don't* update their git tree.
> come on 2.6.32.28 is very old stable compared to 2.6.32.41
>
> So if you might get them to push their RH fixes and updated
> stable trees to their git 2.6.32, the situation might be different.
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 20110620124057.GB14539@vostochny.stro.at">http://lists.debian.org/20110620124057.GB14539@vostochny.stro.at
06-20-2011, 01:00 PM
"Ola Lundqvist"
Possibility of getting openvz problem included in stable?
Hi Maks and Kir
Kir: Some updated statement from Maks.
Maks: I think one reason for not updating is that the version in
Debian stable is usually not updated. So it is hard to tell what
revision the Debian kernel team is regarding stable updates.
// Ola
Quoting "maximilian attems" <max@stro.at>:
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:23:01AM +0000, maximilian attems wrote:
Hi ola,
my patience for openvz is currently gone from epsilon to zero.
see
http://git.openvz.org/?p=linux-2.6.32-openvz;a=summary
and in contrary
http://wiki.openvz.org/Download/kernel/rhel4/023stab054.1
wrong c&p, meant of course,
see how happily that tree is maintained regularly:
http://wiki.openvz.org/Download/kernel/rhel6/042stab017.1
They *don't* update their git tree.
come on 2.6.32.28 is very old stable compared to 2.6.32.41
So if you might get them to push their RH fixes and updated
stable trees to their git 2.6.32, the situation might be different.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 20110620150057.20385ltvvew3u4cg@webmail.inguza.net ">http://lists.debian.org/20110620150057.20385ltvvew3u4cg@webmail.inguza.net
06-20-2011, 01:00 PM
"Ola Lundqvist"
Possibility of getting openvz problem included in stable?
Hi Maks and Kir
Kir: Some updated statement from Maks.
Maks: I think one reason for not updating is that the version in
Debian stable is usually not updated. So it is hard to tell what
revision the Debian kernel team is regarding stable updates.
// Ola
Quoting "maximilian attems" <max@stro.at>:
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:23:01AM +0000, maximilian attems wrote:
Hi ola,
my patience for openvz is currently gone from epsilon to zero.
see
http://git.openvz.org/?p=linux-2.6.32-openvz;a=summary
and in contrary
http://wiki.openvz.org/Download/kernel/rhel4/023stab054.1
wrong c&p, meant of course,
see how happily that tree is maintained regularly:
http://wiki.openvz.org/Download/kernel/rhel6/042stab017.1
They *don't* update their git tree.
come on 2.6.32.28 is very old stable compared to 2.6.32.41
So if you might get them to push their RH fixes and updated
stable trees to their git 2.6.32, the situation might be different.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 20110620150057.20385ltvvew3u4cg@webmail.inguza.net ">http://lists.debian.org/20110620150057.20385ltvvew3u4cg@webmail.inguza.net
06-20-2011, 01:24 PM
maximilian attems
Possibility of getting openvz problem included in stable?
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 03:00:57PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hi Maks and Kir
>
> Kir: Some updated statement from Maks.
>
> Maks: I think one reason for not updating is that the version in
> Debian stable is usually not updated. So it is hard to tell what
> revision the Debian kernel team is regarding stable updates.
>
> // Ola
that is totally uncorrect.
we have pretty much allways synced with available openvz git.
(see 2.6.26 history and 2.6.32 history)
uploads are not immediate as we have a different schedule.
also please next time do at least the *effort* of asking the openvz
guys instead of just forwarding my rants on stupid questions. a little
effort from your side would really be appreciated.
thanks
--
maks
PS. also you didn't cc the debian openvz mailinglist nor pavel.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 20110620132429.GC14539@vostochny.stro.at">http://lists.debian.org/20110620132429.GC14539@vostochny.stro.at
06-20-2011, 01:37 PM
Ben Hutchings
Possibility of getting openvz problem included in stable?
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 15:00 +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hi Maks and Kir
>
> Kir: Some updated statement from Maks.
>
> Maks: I think one reason for not updating is that the version in
> Debian stable is usually not updated. So it is hard to tell what
> revision the Debian kernel team is regarding stable updates.
[...]
It is very easy: you look at the changelog.
If you don't want to get the whole package then see:
<http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/kernel/dists/squeeze/linux-2.6/debian/changelog?revision=HEAD&view=markup>
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
When in doubt, use brute force. - Ken Thompson
06-20-2011, 02:42 PM
"Ola Lundqvist"
Possibility of getting openvz problem included in stable?
Hi Ben
Sorry. My mistake. I looked only at the stable release, not the
stable-security release. If I look into the correct one, yes then it
is quite obvious.
However I have one additional question as I do not know the process
you work with in the kernel team fully. When you update to a newer
version of the kernel package, how do you handle openvz in that case?
I assume you use the same kernel patch as before, but how do that
differ from this case. Or do you mean that the one I referred to was
to some other track than the openvz track? In that case, I'm sorry, I
did not understand that.
Best regards,
/ /Ola
Quoting "Ben Hutchings" <ben@decadent.org.uk>:
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 15:00 +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi Maks and Kir
Kir: Some updated statement from Maks.
Maks: I think one reason for not updating is that the version in
Debian stable is usually not updated. So it is hard to tell what
revision the Debian kernel team is regarding stable updates.
[...]
It is very easy: you look at the changelog.
If you don't want to get the whole package then see:
<http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/kernel/dists/squeeze/linux-2.6/debian/changelog?revision=HEAD&view=markup>
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
When in doubt, use brute force. - Ken Thompson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 20110620164221.18295ici1o1tz6gw@webmail.inguza.net ">http://lists.debian.org/20110620164221.18295ici1o1tz6gw@webmail.inguza.net
Possibility of getting openvz problem included in stable?
