Hi Ben,

Sorry, probably I missed the note about dropping Vserver.
It seemed to be in wide use and under active development.
Pretty disappointing for the Vserver folks, I would guess.

Of course I can give lxc a try, but I am a little bit
concerned that it might get dropped, too, as soon as the next
lightweight virtualization scheme appears on the horizon.


Regards

Harri



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 4DC5C0C4.50602@aixigo.de">http://lists.debian.org/4DC5C0C4.50602@aixigo.de

On Sat, 2011-05-07 at 23:59 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> Sorry, probably I missed the note about dropping Vserver.
> It seemed to be in wide use and under active development.
> Pretty disappointing for the Vserver folks, I would guess.
>
> Of course I can give lxc a try, but I am a little bit
> concerned that it might get dropped, too, as soon as the next
> lightweight virtualization scheme appears on the horizon.

LXC is based on the cgroups and namespace mechanisms in mainline Linux.
It doesn't require out-of-tree patches.

Ben.

--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.