FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Debian > Debian Kernel

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 03-20-2011, 04:24 PM
Luk Claes
 
Default Bug#446238: nfs-common: Locks when using nfs4 sec=krb5 and user ticket expires

Hi

Can you still reproduce this problem or can this old bug be closed?

Cheers

Luk



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 4D86384A.5070301@debian.org">http://lists.debian.org/4D86384A.5070301@debian.org


Sun Mar 20 18:30:02 2011
Return-path: <centos-bounces@centos.org>
Envelope-to: tom@linux-archive.org
Delivery-date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 18:17:07 +0200
Received: from mail.centos.org ([72.26.200.202]:39714)
by s2.java-tips.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <centos-bounces@centos.org>)
id 1Q1LJS-0007Rd-SW
for tom@linux-archive.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 18:17:06 +0200
Received: from mail.centos.org (voxeldev.centos.org [127.0.0.1])
by mail.centos.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2D2B6F7EA;
Sun, 20 Mar 2011 13:30:44 -0400 (EDT)
X-Original-To: centos@centos.org
Delivered-To: centos@centos.org
Received: from as.infoline.su (as.infoline.su [83.217.192.247])
by mail.centos.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 503876F691
for <centos@centos.org>; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 13:30:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from angara.iproducts.test (unknown [89.169.195.181])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by as.infoline.su (Postfix) with ESMTP id E205011404
for <centos@centos.org>; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 20:30:42 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from roundcube.iproducts.test (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by angara.iproducts.test (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p2KHUf5v014241
for <centos@centos.org>; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 20:30:41 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 20:30:41 +0300
From: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=90=D0=BB=D0=B5=D0=BA=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0= B4=D1=80_=D0=9A=D0=B8=D1=80=D0=B8=D0=BB=D0=BB=D0=B E=D0=B2?=
<nevis2us@infoline.su>
To: CentOS mailing list <centos@centos.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.1.00.1103201228300.29355@oebafba.bjyev ire.pbz>
References: <AANLkTim2HA2R7rXpOgeV6yg056Qpn3pWb1r+Su16cbcr@mai l.gmail.com>
<alpine.LRH.1.00.1103201140180.25681@oebafba.bjyev ire.pbz>
<32332532d06650fd10152c39076fdd2a@localhost>
<alpine.LRH.1.00.1103201228300.29355@oebafba.bjyev ire.pbz>
Message-ID: <68c6db56c433086d428f6c7090bd3082@localhost>
X-Sender: nevis2us@infoline.su
User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.3.1
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00
autolearn=ham version=3.2.5
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on
angara.iproducts.test
Subject: Re: [CentOS] The delays on CentOS 5.6 are causing EPEL
incompatibilities
X-BeenThere: centos@centos.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: CentOS mailing list <centos@centos.org>
List-Id: CentOS mailing list <centos.centos.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos>,
<mailto:centos-request@centos.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos>
List-Post: <mailto:centos@centos.org>
List-Help: <mailto:centos-request@centos.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos>,
<mailto:centos-request@centos.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: centos-bounces@centos.org
Errors-To: centos-bounces@centos.org

>>
http://www.usatoday.com/money/smallbusiness/columnist/abrams/2011-03-18-how-to-lose-a-client_N.htm
>
> CentOS has no clients to whom a contractual duty of support is
> owed. If SLAs, sales engineers, 800 numbers, and such are
> wanted or needed, PLEASE buy a contract from someone
>
> TANSTAAFL

The point is it's probably as easy to lose a "community" if this still
matters to the core CentOS team.
After so many suggestions to look elsewhere instead of providing minimal
feedback
for those still interested the long overdue "free lunch" would probably
stuck down the throat.
And yes I started looking elsewhere and with reasonably priced offer from
Oracle
this project is probably dead in the water.

Best regards,
AK

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
Old 03-22-2011, 01:46 PM
Pedro Celestino dos Reis Rodrigues
 
Default Bug#446238: nfs-common: Locks when using nfs4 sec=krb5 and user ticket expires

Hello


On Sunday 20 Mars 2011 17:24:26 Luk Claes wrote:
> Hi
>
> Can you still reproduce this problem or can this old bug be closed?
>
> Cheers
>
> Luk

At this moment, I am no longer administrating the network that have the
triggering configuration. I only know that it is yet operational and that the
software version installed was not changed, so I can not give a prompt answer.
The best I can do is to give a try to reproduce the problem in squeeze during
the weekend.

--
Com os melhores cumprimentos

Pedro
______________________________________
Pedro Celestino dos Reis Rodrigues
Faculdade de CiÍncias da Universidade de Lisboa
Departamento de Geologia
Tel: 21750000-26152,26140
Centro de CiÍncias Moleculares e Materiais
Tel: 21750000-28356



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 201103221446.06671.reis@fc.ul.pt">http://lists.debian.org/201103221446.06671.reis@fc.ul.pt
 
Old 03-22-2011, 05:10 PM
Luk Claes
 
Default Bug#446238: nfs-common: Locks when using nfs4 sec=krb5 and user ticket expires

On 03/22/2011 03:46 PM, Pedro Celestino dos Reis Rodrigues wrote:
> Hello
>
>
> On Sunday 20 Mars 2011 17:24:26 Luk Claes wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Can you still reproduce this problem or can this old bug be closed?
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Luk
>
> At this moment, I am no longer administrating the network that have the
> triggering configuration. I only know that it is yet operational and that the
> software version installed was not changed, so I can not give a prompt answer.
> The best I can do is to give a try to reproduce the problem in squeeze during
> the weekend.

Fair enough. I'll await your reply.

Thanks already!

Luk



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 4D88E62C.5050407@debian.org">http://lists.debian.org/4D88E62C.5050407@debian.org
 
Old 07-08-2011, 01:14 PM
Juha Erkkilš
 
Default Bug#446238: nfs-common: Locks when using nfs4 sec=krb5 and user ticket expires

I am seeing a very similar issue with Ubuntu Lucid release. In my tests the kerberos ticket does not actually need to expire, instead it is enough if it is simply destroyed or removed from the filesystem. See http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-nfs/msg22430.html for more information.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: fbc83cc2-13cd-44d3-84f7-a6f9d36bd5be@mail">http://lists.debian.org/fbc83cc2-13cd-44d3-84f7-a6f9d36bd5be@mail
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 09:47 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright ©2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org