reopen 463253
thanks

Hi maks,

please reconsider your decision. This is not the right way to handle
such issues, as it breaks the systems for lots of people.
I, as co-maintainer of hal, can't immediately come up with a patch. This
takes time to test and do properly.
The right way to do this, is file bugs against all relevant packages,
add a tracking bug and when all apps have been ported to the new
interface, remove the deprecated interface from the kernel.
The current approach is a disservice to our users.

Cheers,
Michael
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?

On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 05:27:16AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> reopen 463253
> thanks

it doesn't really matter if that one is open as at least another
got filed.

> please reconsider your decision. This is not the right way to handle
> such issues, as it breaks the systems for lots of people.
> I, as co-maintainer of hal, can't immediately come up with a patch. This
> takes time to test and do properly.

ack
it seems that userspaces didn't yet grok up the /sys interface,
was worth a try, will be redone in april.

> The right way to do this, is file bugs against all relevant packages,
> add a tracking bug and when all apps have been ported to the new
> interface, remove the deprecated interface from the kernel.
> The current approach is a disservice to our users.

can you push the fix for the "double" battery in hal when both
are enabled?

sunny weekend

--
maks




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

maximilian attems schrieb:
> On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 05:27:16AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:

>> please reconsider your decision. This is not the right way to handle
>> such issues, as it breaks the systems for lots of people.
>> I, as co-maintainer of hal, can't immediately come up with a patch. This
>> takes time to test and do properly.
>
> ack
> it seems that userspaces didn't yet grok up the /sys interface,
> was worth a try, will be redone in april.

Ok, that should be enough time ;-)

>> The right way to do this, is file bugs against all relevant packages,
>> add a tracking bug and when all apps have been ported to the new
>> interface, remove the deprecated interface from the kernel.
>> The current approach is a disservice to our users.
>
> can you push the fix for the "double" battery in hal when both
> are enabled?

Will do.

Cheers,
Michael

--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?

maximilian attems wrote:
>
> ack
> it seems that userspaces didn't yet grok up the /sys interface,

Btw, this is a reason why I'd suggest to use

CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS=y
CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER=y
CONFIG_ACPI_SYSFS_POWER=n
CONFIG_ACPI_PROC_EVENT=y

for the etch'n half kernel (given that it's 2.6.24). But I'm sure you
already considered that ;-)

Cheers,
Michael

On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 03:14:32PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
> Btw, this is a reason why I'd suggest to use
>
> CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS=y
> CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER=y
> CONFIG_ACPI_SYSFS_POWER=n
> CONFIG_ACPI_PROC_EVENT=y
>
> for the etch'n half kernel (given that it's 2.6.24). But I'm sure you
> already considered that ;-)

sure etch+half is not a dev version.

see d-kernel thread for several config options that will be different.





--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org