FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Debian > Debian Kernel

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 05-30-2010, 12:41 PM
Moritz Muehlenhoff
 
Default Bug#576077: linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64: btrfs allocation failed while accessing from fslint

tags 576077 moreinfo
thanks

On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:08:12AM -0500, Rob wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-5
> Severity: important
>
> Searching with FSlint as nonpriv user for duplicates throws this kernel message after recursing into root owned directory on a btrfs volume that is luks encrypted. FSlint throws up an error about not being priviliged and stops searching.

Please retry this with the current kernel from unstable and without
the virtualbox modules being loaded.

Cheers,
Moritz



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 20100530124155.GF2398@galadriel.inutil.org">http://lists.debian.org/20100530124155.GF2398@galadriel.inutil.org
 
Old 08-26-2011, 03:09 AM
Jonathan Nieder
 
Default Bug#576077: linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64: btrfs allocation failed while accessing from fslint

Hi Rob,

Rob wrote:

> [60921.440540] btrfs allocation failed flags 2, wanted 4096
> [60921.440545] space_info has 4128768 free, is not full
> [60921.440548] space_info total=4194304, pinned=0, delalloc=0, may_use=0, used=0, root=0, super=65536, reserved=0

Hm, doesn't look like you're low on space. But:

[...]
> [60921.440600] kernel BUG at /build/buildd-linux-2.6_2.6.32-5-amd64-9RvY2G/linux-2.6-2.6.32/debian/build/source_amd64_none/fs/btrfs/volumes.c:2389!
[...]
> [60921.440771] [<ffffffffa0da713b>] ? btrfs_alloc_chunk+0x75/0x86 [btrfs]
> [60921.440777] [<ffffffff810e3a5d>] ? virt_to_head_page+0x9/0x2b
> [60921.440787] [<ffffffffa0d78f85>] ? do_chunk_alloc+0x17f/0x1de [btrfs]
> [60921.440798] [<ffffffffa0d7af2e>] ? btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb6/0x1cf [btrfs]
> [60921.440809] [<ffffffffa0d9f60e>] ? merge_state+0x98/0x106 [btrfs]
> [60921.440820] [<ffffffffa0d7b0a1>] ? btrfs_alloc_free_block+0x5a/0x1a9 [btrfs]
> [60921.440832] [<ffffffffa0d9f225>] ? test_range_bit+0x50/0xd3 [btrfs]
[...]
> [60921.440993] Code: 75 2f e9 92 01 00 00 48 63 c5 48 83 c0 02 48 c1 e0 04 49 8b 34 04 4c 01 be a0 00 00 00 48 8b 7c 24 20 e8 35 fe ff ff 85 c0 74 04 <0f> 0b eb fe ff c5 41 3b 6c 24 18 7c cf 48 8d 73 30 31 ff eb 3e
> [60921.441025] RIP [<ffffffffa0da53f2>] __finish_chunk_alloc+0x92/0x20f [btrfs]
> [60921.441036] RSP <ffff8801cba19818>

It still looks vaguely reminiscent of the bug fixed by
v3.1-rc1~82^2~25^2~8 (Btrfs: fix BUG_ON() caused by ENOSPC when
relocating space, 2011-07-15).

Was this reproducible? If so, could you try v3.1-rc1 or later[1]?

Sorry for the trouble,
Jonathan

[1] http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ch-common-tasks.html#s-kernel-org-package



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 20110826030911.GA3928@elie.gateway.2wire.net">http ://lists.debian.org/20110826030911.GA3928@elie.gateway.2wire.net
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 08:11 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org