On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 07:05:07PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
> On Mon, 17.09.2007 at 20:04:24 -0400, Michael Stone <email@example.com> wrote:
> > I'm going to reassign this to linux-image. The basic problem seems to be
> > the loss of responsiveness, which is probably caused by excessive
> > amounts of large block size IO on the encrypted volume. There's a
> > possible issue with the OOM killer.
> FWIW, today I also saw OOM killer in (broken?) action. Imho, OOM killer
> should only trigger if there's at least either no more RAM to work
> with, and note this in the syslog, or when swap is exhausted.
> My kern.log has this, with the time stamp and hostname removed:
> DMA: 465*4kB 17*8kB 1*16kB 1*32kB 1*64kB 0*128kB 1*256kB 1*512kB 1*1024kB 1*2048kB 0*4096kB = 5948kB
> DMA32: empty
> Normal: empty
> HighMem: empty
> Swap cache: add 2195725, delete 2046650, find 782418/975703, race 1+47
> Free swap = 2489952kB
> Total swap = 4194296kB
> Free swap: 2489952kB
> 483649 pages of RAM
> 14999 reserved pages
> 70 pages shared
> 149071 pages swap cached
> Unfortunately, I can't make too much out of these numbers.
The next release of Debian (6.0, code name Squeeze) will be based
on 2.6.32. Please test the current 2.6.32 from unstable/testing and tell
us whether the problem persists.
The 2.6.32 kernel is available from packages.debian.org and can
be installed in both Debian stable, testing and unstable
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org