FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Debian > Debian Kernel

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 02-14-2010, 10:00 AM
Stephan Austermühle
 
Default Bug#556231: Bug #556231

Sorry, cannot find an updated 2.6.30-2-amd64 on unstable. Do you mean
2.6.32-2-amd64?
 
Old 02-14-2010, 10:37 AM
Moritz Muehlenhoff
 
Default Bug#556231: Bug #556231

On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 12:00:41PM +0100, Stephan Austermühle wrote:
> Sorry, cannot find an updated 2.6.30-2-amd64 on unstable. Do you
> mean 2.6.32-2-amd64?

Yes, please try that version.

Cheers,
Moritz









--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 20100214113704.GA3368@galadriel.inutil.org">http://lists.debian.org/20100214113704.GA3368@galadriel.inutil.org
 
Old 02-14-2010, 08:23 PM
maximilian attems
 
Default Bug#556231: Bug #556231

On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 12:00:41PM +0100, Stephan Austermühle wrote:
> Sorry, cannot find an updated 2.6.30-2-amd64 on unstable. Do you mean
> 2.6.32-2-amd64?

yes of course, sorry for the typo. 2.6.30 is dead.






--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 20100214212349.GI9624@baikonur.stro.at">http://lists.debian.org/20100214212349.GI9624@baikonur.stro.at
 
Old 02-23-2010, 05:52 AM
Stephan Austermühle
 
Default Bug#556231: Bug #556231

No issues so far with 2.6.32. xfsdump to tape seems to work better now,
i.e. no panics.


I think we can close this bug.
 
Old 02-23-2010, 06:52 AM
Stephan Austermühle
 
Default Bug#556231: Bug #556231

Ooops... just seconds after my mail the server panic'd while xfsdumping
to tape:


Kernel panic - not syncing: xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim
0xffff8800642fcd80


Pid: 47, comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 2.6.32-2-amd64 #1
Call trace:
[...] ? panic+0x86/0x141
[...] ? __up_write+0x12/0x45
[...] ? xfs_iunlock+0x42/0x7c [xfs]
[...] ? xfs_reclaim_inode+x094/0x12e [xfs]
[...] ? xfs_fs_destroy_inode+0x4b/0x4d [xfs]
[...] ? dispose_list+0xce/0xfe
[...] ? shrink_icache_memory+0x1f2/0x228
[...] ? shrink_slab+0xe0/0x153
[...] ? kswapd+0x4d9/0x683
[...] ? isolate_pages_global+0x0/0x20f
[...] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2e
[...] ? kswapd+0x0/0x683
[...] ? kthread+0x79/0x81
[...] ? child_rip+0xa/0x20
[...] ? kthread+0x0/0x81

Looks like my issue is *not* fixed.
 
Old 02-23-2010, 09:35 AM
maximilian attems
 
Default Bug#556231: Bug #556231

On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 08:52:05AM +0100, Stephan Austermühle wrote:
> Ooops... just seconds after my mail the server panic'd while xfsdumping
> to tape:
>
> Kernel panic - not syncing: xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim
> 0xffff8800642fcd80
>
> Pid: 47, comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 2.6.32-2-amd64 #1
> Call trace:
> [...] ? panic+0x86/0x141
> [...] ? __up_write+0x12/0x45
> [...] ? xfs_iunlock+0x42/0x7c [xfs]
> [...] ? xfs_reclaim_inode+x094/0x12e [xfs]
> [...] ? xfs_fs_destroy_inode+0x4b/0x4d [xfs]
> [...] ? dispose_list+0xce/0xfe
> [...] ? shrink_icache_memory+0x1f2/0x228
> [...] ? shrink_slab+0xe0/0x153
> [...] ? kswapd+0x4d9/0x683
> [...] ? isolate_pages_global+0x0/0x20f
> [...] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2e
> [...] ? kswapd+0x0/0x683
> [...] ? kthread+0x79/0x81
> [...] ? child_rip+0xa/0x20
> [...] ? kthread+0x0/0x81
>
> Looks like my issue is *not* fixed.

christoph any hint on this xfsdump to tape issue?
(2.6.30 up to 2.6.32):
http://bugs.debian.org/556231

xfsdump version is not specified. Stefan could you add that info?
output of:
dpkg -l xfsdump



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 20100223103545.GB15228@baikonur.stro.at">http://lists.debian.org/20100223103545.GB15228@baikonur.stro.at
 
Old 02-23-2010, 09:55 AM
Stephan Austermühle
 
Default Bug#556231: Bug #556231

Hi all,

Am 23.02.2010 11:35, schrieb maximilian attems:


xfsdump version is not specified. Stefan could you add that info?
output of:
dpkg -l xfsdump


Here we go...

# dpkg -l xfsdump
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
|
Status=Not/Inst/Cfg-files/Unpacked/Failed-cfg/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err:
uppercase=bad)

||/ Name Version Description
+++-=================-=================-==================================================
ii xfsdump 3.0.2 Administrative utilities for the
XFS filesystem



Best regards,

Stephan
 
Old 05-22-2010, 05:42 PM
Moritz Muehlenhoff
 
Default Bug#556231: Bug #556231

On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:55:57AM +0100, Stephan Austermühle wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Am 23.02.2010 11:35, schrieb maximilian attems:
>
> >xfsdump version is not specified. Stefan could you add that info?
> >output of:
> >dpkg -l xfsdump
>
> Here we go...
>
> # dpkg -l xfsdump
> Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
> | Status=Not/Inst/Cfg-files/Unpacked/Failed-cfg/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
> |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err:
> uppercase=bad)
> ||/ Name Version Description
> +++-=================-=================-==================================================
> ii xfsdump 3.0.2 Administrative utilities for
> the XFS filesystem

2.6.32.12 has introduced lots of xfs bugfixes. Please try the current
2.6.32-13 kernel from unstable. If the error can still be reproduced
it should be reported upstream at bugzilla.kernel.org

Cheers,
Moritz




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 20100522174219.GA28811@galadriel.inutil.org">http://lists.debian.org/20100522174219.GA28811@galadriel.inutil.org
 
Old 05-26-2010, 06:35 AM
Stephan Austermühle
 
Default Bug#556231: Bug #556231

Hi all,

Am 22.05.2010 19:42, schrieb Moritz Muehlenhoff:

> 2.6.32.12 has introduced lots of xfs bugfixes. Please try the current
> 2.6.32-13 kernel from unstable. If the error can still be reproduced
> it should be reported upstream at bugzilla.kernel.org

Looks like my issue has been solved with 2.6.32-13. At least I was not
able to reproduce the error within three attempts anymore (every
complete xfsdump run takes many, many hours).

Best regards,

Stephan
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 11:20 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright ©2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org