FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Debian > Debian Kernel

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 02-26-2009, 08:14 PM
Jonas Smedegaard
 
Default Bug#517260: Do Debian Policy 3.5 not apply to unstable?!?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Please reopen this bug.

Debian Policy 3.5 mandates correct package dependencies.

Debian Policy also applies to Debian unstable too.

The "unstable" refer to the collection of packages - each individual
package released to "unstable" should itself be non-broken.

Use experimental for possibly-broken packages.


- Jonas

- --
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkmnBkIACgkQn7DbMsAkQLiw0gCggoc76YFGKk 2tgiiHVGPwLmmv
5J0AnieeukQso1j1Rd0jDcShSoRhnSbo
=Wb/J
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
 
Old 02-26-2009, 08:26 PM
Luk Claes
 
Default Bug#517260: Do Debian Policy 3.5 not apply to unstable?!?

Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Please reopen this bug.
>
> Debian Policy 3.5 mandates correct package dependencies.
>
> Debian Policy also applies to Debian unstable too.
>
> The "unstable" refer to the collection of packages - each individual
> package released to "unstable" should itself be non-broken.

It's not broken, it's common to have some things that are out of sync in
unstable...

Cheers

Luk



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
 
Old 02-26-2009, 08:39 PM
maximilian attems
 
Default Bug#517260: Do Debian Policy 3.5 not apply to unstable?!?

On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:14:42PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Please reopen this bug.
>
> Debian Policy 3.5 mandates correct package dependencies.
>
> Debian Policy also applies to Debian unstable too.
>
> The "unstable" refer to the collection of packages - each individual
> package released to "unstable" should itself be non-broken.
>
> Use experimental for possibly-broken packages.

you don't get anything, please stop nagging around on d-kernel.

--
maks




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
 
Old 02-26-2009, 09:25 PM
Jonas Smedegaard
 
Default Bug#517260: Do Debian Policy 3.5 not apply to unstable?!?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:26:26PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
>Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> Please reopen this bug.
>>
>> Debian Policy 3.5 mandates correct package dependencies.
>>
>> Debian Policy also applies to Debian unstable too.
>>
>> The "unstable" refer to the collection of packages - each individual
>> package released to "unstable" should itself be non-broken.
>
>It's not broken, it's common to have some things that are out of sync
>in unstable...

Thanks, Luk.

I see the point now.


- Jonas

- --
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkmnFvYACgkQn7DbMsAkQLivDwCbBZggY0wrsu PF9vKjlLDAn9BV
LQAAoKext1Yd60oWsyNGXC5iQdViJwH7
=qMcn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
 
Old 02-26-2009, 09:28 PM
Jonas Smedegaard
 
Default Bug#517260: Do Debian Policy 3.5 not apply to unstable?!?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:39:17PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:14:42PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> Please reopen this bug.
>>
>> Debian Policy 3.5 mandates correct package dependencies.
>>
>> Debian Policy also applies to Debian unstable too.
>>
>> The "unstable" refer to the collection of packages - each individual
>> package released to "unstable" should itself be non-broken.
>>
>> Use experimental for possibly-broken packages.
>
>you don't get anything, please stop nagging around on d-kernel.

You get everything: Naturally my interest is not the quality of Debian,
but only to bother you the most I can.


- Jonas

- --
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkmnF54ACgkQn7DbMsAkQLhLEgCeOuNkrdTucB Qrj9ISo9Puhfy5
YQsAn0uoxwdfug79LTvWnkLSnUA8whHd
=84fI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 10:29 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org